Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tob Control. 2021 Jan 15;31(3):411–415. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055922

Table 3.

Multilevel, random-effects ordered logistic regression models (n=4472)

No of products used*
OR
95% CI
Cigarette type
 Non-menthol cigarettes 1.00 (Ref)
 Menthol cigarette 1.25*** (1.11 to 1.41)
Sex
 Males 1.00 (Ref)
 Females 0.51*** (0.46 to 0.58)
 Age 0.91*** (0.89 to 0.93)
Race/ethnicity
 White 1.00 (Ref)
 Hispanic/Latino 1.05 (0.92 to 1.19)
 African American 1.47*** (1.11 to 1.94)
 Asian 1.52*** (1.26 to 1.83)
 Other 1.55*** (1.26 to 1.90)
Institution type§
 2 years 1.00 (Ref)
 4 years 1.15 (0.88 to 1.50)
Nicotine dependence
 No 1.00 (Ref)
 Yes 1.36*** (1.20 to 1.55)
Post hoc test
Interaction term for cigarette type and survey wave
Survey wave * cigarette type
 Menthol * wave 1 1.00 (Ref)
 Menthol * wave 2 0.98 (0.68 to 1.41)
 Menthol * wave 3 1.02 (0.71 to 1.46)
 Menthol * wave 4 1.06 (0.74 to 1.52)
 Menthol * wave 5 1.17 (0.80 to 1.71)
 Menthol * wave 6 0.95 (0.64 to 1.40)

Proportional odds model was used.

Bold indicates statistical significance; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

*

Corresponds to the number of non-cigarette tobacco products used in the past 30 days.

Self-reported type (ie, menthol/mint; non-menthol/mint) of cigarette smoked in the past 30 days.

Individuals who identify as American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander or any other race/ethnicity.

§

Indicates if individuals attended a 2-year vocational/technical programme or 4-year college/university.

Self-reported needing or craving a cigarette.