Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;8:667527. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.667527

Table 2.

Sub-group analysis.

Killip grade I Killip grade II Killip grade III–IV
NFHG n = 216 FHG n = 140 NFHG n = 82 FHG n = 70 NFHG n = 15 FHG n = 40
Gender, male, % 186 (86.1) 101 (72.1)* 65 (79.3) 53 (75.7) 14 (93.3) 29 (72.5)
Age, year, x¯ ±s 61.8 ± 12.8 63.2 ± 13.2 64.2 ± 12.2 65.0 ± 12 65.7 ± 4.1 64.0 ± 2.4
Left ejection fraction x¯ ±s 0.54 ± 0.11 0.51 ± 0.13 0.50 ± 0.11 0.46 ± 0.12 0.46 ± 0.11 0.45 ± 0.13
Serum potassium x¯ ±s 3.82 ± 0.40 3.80 ± 0.42 3.82 ± 0.36 3.82 ± 0.46 3.79 ± 0.46 3.78 ± 0.42
Left atrial diameter x¯ ±s 34.8 ± 5.8 34.1 ± 8.3 37.1 ± 8.1 36.2 ± 8.0 34.8 ± 5.8 34.1 ± 8.3
Diabetes, n % 16 (7.4) 28 (20.0) 8 (9.8) 8 (11.4) 2 (13.3) 9 (22.5)
Hypertension, n% 94 (43.5) 64 (45.7) 38 (46.3) 33 (47.1) 5 (33.3) 17 (42.5)
Rate of new onset fibrillation, n, % 14 (6.5) 23 (16.4)* 10 (12.2) 15 (21.4)§ 5 (33.3) 16 (40)

Baseline characteristic and new onset AF comparation between NFHG group and FHG group under different killip level.

*

p < 0.01;

§

p < 0.001.