Table 5.
Linear regression model for ADG with animal and pen-level factors
| ADG1 | Coefficient | SEM | 95% CI | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy2 | Ref3 | ||||
| DD | −0.14 | 0.03 | −0.19 | −0.09 | <0.001 |
| FR | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.14 | <0.001 |
| Sex and type4 | |||||
| FPH | Ref3 | ||||
| WPH | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.1 | <0.001 |
| FPS | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.27 | <0.001 |
| WPS | 0.38 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.42 | <0.001 |
| Pen condition5 | |||||
| 1 | Ref3 | ||||
| 2 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −0.05 | −0.01 | 0.5 |
| 3 | −0.14 | 0.01 | −0.16 | −0.12 | <0.001 |
| 4 | −0.38 | 0.02 | −0.42 | −0.36 | <0.001 |
| Pen of origin6 | −0.02 | 0.002 | −0.02 | −0.01 | <0.001 |
| Herd ADG | 1.58 | 0.01 | 1.55 | 1.6 | <0.001 |
1ADG, average daily gain.
2DD, digital dermatitis; FR, foot rot.
3Reference group used for comparisons.
4FPH, fall-placed heifer; WPH, winter-placed heifer; FPS, fall-placed steer; WPS, winter-placed steer.
5Pen condition: 1=dry, 2=more bedding than mud, 3=more mud than bedding, and 4=excessive mud.
6Pen of origin as a variable with random effect.