Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 10;5(3):txab104. doi: 10.1093/tas/txab104

Table 2.

Effects of feeder design on hay intake and apparent digestibility, Exp. 1

Feeder design1
Item OBSR POLY RING BASK SEM2 P-value
No. of bales measured3 8 8 8 8
Intake4
 DMI, kg/d 8.16 8.42 8.78 8.40 0.49 0.06
 DMI, % BW 1.62 1.67 1.74 1.67 0.05 0.12
 DOMI, kg/d 10.6a 10.8a 11.5b 10.6a 0.29 0.01
 DOMI, % BW 0.95a 0.97a 1.03b 0.95a 0.03 0.01
Apparent Digestibility5
 DM, % 56.0 55.6 57.0 54.6 1.7 0.82
 OM, % 58.7 58.2 59.3 57.0 1.8 0.86

1OBSR = conventional open bottom steel ring feeder; POLY = polyethylene pipe open bottom ring feeder; RING = sheeted bottom steel ring feeder; BASK = sheeted bottom feeder with basket feature.

2SEM of the Least squares means.

3Hay waste measured for two bales during each period over four periods.

4DMI = daily dry matter intake, kg/d; DMI, % BW = daily dry matter intake expressed as a percentage of BW; DOMI, kg/d = daily digestible organic matter intake, kg/d; DOMI, % BW = daily digestible organic matter intake expressed as a percentage of BW.

5DM = dry matter digestibility, % of total DM; OM = organic matter digestibility, % of total OM.

a,bWithin a row, means without a common superscript differ (P ≤ 0.03).