Table 4.
Effects of feeder design on hay waste, orts, and disappearance, Exp. 2
Feeder design1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Item | RING | CONE | SEM2 | P-value |
No. of bales measured3 | 8 | 8 | ||
Bale DM weight, kg | 534.7 | 536.8 | 15.6 | 0.89 |
First 24-h waste, % of bale DM4 | 7.70 | 2.14 | 0.92 | < 0.01 |
Second 24-h waste, % of bale DM4 | 4.16 | 2.62 | 0.65 | 0.11 |
Total 48-h waste, % of bale DM4 | 11.9 | 4.77 | 0.6 | < 0.01 |
Orts, % of bale DM5 | 24.6 | 29.4 | 1.5 | 0.16 |
Forage DM consumed, % of bale DM | 63.6 | 65.9 | 1.3 | 0.26 |
1RING = sheeted bottom steel ring feeder; CONE = RING feeder equipped with a cone insert.
2Standard error of least squares means
3Hay waste measured for two bales during each period over four periods.
4Hay waste expressed as a percentage of initial bale weight for first 24 h, second 24 h and total 48 h.
5Orts = hay DM remaining inside the feeder 48 h after bale introduction to the paddock.