Table 3.

Correlation between resistance phenotype and genotype among studied LAB species (n = 40).

Strains	Resistance phenotypea	Resistance genotype
L. fermentum KKP 2020	TE	n.d.
L. fermentum KKP 830		n.d.
L. brevis Pat1		n.d.
L. brevis Solaris		n.d.
L. brevis Pap3/4		n.d.
L. farraginis E/J		n.d.
P. pentosaceus Pom7		n.d.
L. buchneri KKP 2047p	K	aph(3″)-IIIa
L. fermentum Sieger		n.d.
L. plantarum KKP 815		n.d.
L. plantarum KKP 835		aph(3″)-IIIa
L. plantarum KKP 870		aph(3″)-IIIa
L. plantarum KKP 872		n.d.
L. plantarum KKP 2021p		n.d.
L. plantarum KKP 1821		n.d.
L. plantarum KKP 1822		aph(3″)-IIIa
L. plantarum ATCC 8287		n.d.
L. delbrueckii PCM 490		n.d.
P. pentosaceus MA	K – TE	n.d.
L. salivarius KKP 1828	K – S	n.d.
L. rhamnosus KKP 849	K – CH	n.d.
L. plantarum KKP 804	A	n.d.
L. rhamnosus B/J	GM – K	n.d.
L. acidophilus PCM 2499	TE – S	tet(K), str(A)/str(B)
P. pentosaceus WN1		n.d.
E. durans KKP 1586	E – CL	erm(B)
E. faecium TR2	TE – E	tet(M), msr(C), lnu(A)
L. diolivorans KKP 2036p	TE – K – S	aph(3″)-IIIa
L. salivarius KKP 1835		tet(M), str(A)/str(B)
P. pentosaceus KapA		n.d.
P. pentosaceus AG		n.d.
P. acidilactici KKP 1839		n.d.
L. johnsonii KKP 878	TE – CH – S	n.d.
L. agilis KKP 1834	GM – K – S – E	aph(3″)-IIIa, msr(C)
L. fermentum KKP 811, KKP 830, KKP 843	K	aph(3″)-IIIa
L. plantarum KKP 870, KKP 872	CL	lnu(A)
L. plantarum KKP 2021p	CL	erm(B)

^aGM, gentamicin; K, kanamycin; TE, tetracycline; CH, chloramphenicol; A, ampicillin; E, erythromycin; CL, clindamycin; S, streptomycin; n.d., tested resistance genes not detected. The strains carrying a resistance gene but phenotypically resistant only in line to cut-off values adopted in previous EFSA guideline (2012) are in bold.