Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 1;12:675554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675554

Table 3.

Participants' perceptions of animal welfare in pork production.

Item Category Sample size (person) Proportion
Satisfaction with current pork quality and safety (1 = total dissatisfaction, 10 = total satisfaction) 1 7 2.13
2 7 2.13
3 24 7.32
4 16 4.88
5 69 21.04
6 63 19.21
7 67 20.43
8 50 15.24
9 12 3.66
10 13 3.96
Knowledge of animal (e.g., pig) welfare No knowledge 217 66.16
Low knowledge 76 23.17
Medium knowledge 20 6.10
High knowledge 13 3.96
Very high knowledge 2 0.61
Ready access to a satisfactory diet Very unimportant 4 1.22
Unimportant 2 0.61
Neither important nor unimportant 45 13.72
More important 134 40.85
Very important 143 43.60
Living in a well-ventilated pigsty that allows comfortable rest and activity Very unimportant 4 1.22
Unimportant 2 0.61
Neither important nor unimportant 47 14.33
More important 106 32.32
Very important 169 51.52
Access to immediate treatment when sick Very unimportant 2 0.61
Unimportant 1 0.31
Neither important nor unimportant 21 6.40
More important 51 15.55
Very important 253 77.13
Whether or not it is necessary to safeguard the welfare of pigs and other animals Completely unnecessary 5 1.53
Unnecessary 12 3.66
Uncertain 17 5.18
Slightly necessary 119 36.28
Completely necessary 175 53.35
Whether or not it helps improve pork quality and safety by safeguarding pig welfare Unhelpful 6 1.83
Slightly helpful 37 11.28
Uncertain 30 9.15
Helpful 147 44.82
Very helpful 108 32.92