Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2021 May 1;48(5):370–380. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001327

Table 2.

Clinical and economic (net present value 2018 $US) outcomes [median (95% uncertainty interval)] of human papillomavirus (HPV) primary screening with partial genotyping or extended genotyping (patient management strategies 1-3) over 40 simulated years in a cohort of 100,000 US women

Scenario Number of genotype tests Number of cytologies Number of colposcopies Number of LEEPs Number of ICC Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) Cost of genotype tests (in millions) Total cost (in millions) ICER ($/QALY)*
HPV primary with partial genotyping 575,598 144,332 23,583 1,611 48 1,240,569 17.6 30.4 -
(410,407 - 738,479) (99,611 - 190,494) (19,223 - 27,799) (1,473 - 1,763) (35 - 64) (923,530 - 1,543,255) (13.7 - 21.1) (24.6 - 35.9)
$43.33 Onclarity test
Patient management strategy 1 573,020 144,375 22,699 1,592 48 1,242,093 17.5 30.1 Dominant
(408,505 - 739,428) (99,045 - 193,070) (18,252 - 26,905) (1,453 - 1,747) (34 - 65) (918,894 - 1,532,973) (13.6 - 21.2) (24.3 - 35.4)
Patient management strategy 2 574,712 143,971 21,323 1,501 50 1,243,995 17.5 29.6 Dominant
(413,495 - 738,657) (99,670 - 191,619) (17,022 - 25,516) (1,359 - 1,632) (36 - 67) (922,480 - 1,528,628) (13.8 - 21.1) (23.8 - 35.0)
Patient management strategy 3 573,808 143,249 20,572 1,442 50 1,242,874 17.5 29.2 Dominant
(399,578 - 733,365) (97,581 - 191,642) (16,161 - 24,626) (1,302 - 1,576) (37 - 65) (901,701 - 1,537,171) (13.4 - 21.0) (23.2 - 34.7)
$75 Onclarity test
Patient management strategy 1 573,599 143,458 22,610 1,593 48 1,242,835 30.3 42.8 5,472
(407,922 - 728,811) (98,368 - 188,653) (18,157 - 26,837) (1,450 - 1,727) (35 - 62) (916,214 - 1,524,269) (23.5 - 36.2) (34.1 - 50.8)
Patient management strategy 2 572,730 143,181 21,352 1,502 49 1,242,246 30.2 42.5 7,236
(404,442 - 735,325) (98,279 - 193,460) (16,982 - 25,524) (1,360 - 1,635) (37 - 66) (908,881 - 1,529,568) (23.4 - 36.5) (33.7 - 50.2)
Patient management strategy 3 573,372 144,205 20,656 1,443 50 1,242,143 30.3 42.1 2,298
(401,296 - 728,829) (97,365 - 190,506) (16,123 - 24,466) (1,308 - 1,579) (38 - 64) (905,372 - 1,522,290) (23.3 - 36.2) (33.1 - 50.0)

Note: Patient management strategy ordered by increasing number of high-risk HPV genotypes for which cytology results of negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) were deferred to co-testing instead of colposcopy (i.e., in Group C). Patient management strategy 1: 31, 45, 33/58, 51, 52, 35/39/68 with any abnormal cytology results will go to colposcopy; and 56/59/66 with atypical glandular cells (AGC), atypical squamous cells: cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H), or a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) on cytology will go to colposcopy

Patient management strategy 2: 31, 45, 33/58, 52 with any abnormal cytology results will go to colposcopy; and 51, 35/39/68, 56/59/69 with AGC, ASC-H, HSIL will go to colposcopy

Patient management strategy 3: 31, 45, 33/58 with any abnormal cytology results will go to colposcopy; and 51, 52, 35/39/68, 56/59/66 with AGC, ASC-H, HSIL will go to colposcopy

ICC=invasive cervical cancer; ICER=incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; LEEP=loop electrosurgical excision procedure

Dominant indicates HPV primary screening with extended genotyping is less costly and more effective than HPV primary screening

*

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of HPV primary screening with extended genotyping compared to partial genotyping. QALYs and total cost values in the table are rounded to millions and cannot be used to reconstruct ICERs reported in the tables and text, which used unrounded values.

Compared to HPV primary screening with partial genotyping, increases in QALYs with extended genotyping were not statistically significant, with wide ranges due to variability in the model.