Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;19(4):209–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2021.06.002

Table 4.

Comparison of the effects on physical and cognitive function between the three groups (sub-group analysis).


NW - Walking
NW - Control
Walking - Control
Difference 95% Cl Adjusted P-value Difference 95% Cl Adjusted P-value Difference 95% Cl Adjusted P-value
MVPA (min/week) 14.3 −53.6 82.2 0.68 61.7 −16.3 139.7 0.12 47.4 −16.5 111.1 0.15
Dominant hand grip strength (kg) 2.0 0.2 3.9 0.03 2.0 −0.2 4.1 0.08 −0.1 −1.8 1.7 0.99
Maximal walking speed (m/sec) 0.3 0.1 0.6 <0.01 0.2 −0.1 0.5 0.23 −0.1 −0.4 0.1 0.41
Single leg stance test (sec) −2.7 −12.5 7.1 0.59 −5.4 −16.9 6.0 0.35 −2.8 −12.2 6.7 0.57
Timed Up and Go test (sec) 0.10 −0.40 0.60 0.89 0.03 −0.51 0.57 0.99 −0.06 −0.53 0.41 0.95
MoCA-J score (points) 1.7 0.1 3.2 0.04 1.7 −0.2 3.5 0.08 0.0 −1.6 1.6 1.00
Delta TMT (sec) −51.5 −108.1 5.2 0.08 −46.1 −115.3 23.2 0.19 5.4 −55.8 66.6 0.86

Notes: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted. The model included individuals in the NW group who performed NW more than once a week, and individuals in either the walking or control groups who performed any type of physical exercise more than once a week (NW: n = 8, Walking: n = 17, Control: n = 9). Age, educational attainment, and the baseline value of each dependent variable were adjusted. Difference indicates that the difference of least square means between groups based on ANCOVA. Adjusted P-values indicate multiplicity-adjusted P-values based on Tukey's method.

Abbreviations: MVPA; Moderate to vigorous physical activity, MoCA-J score; Montreal Cognitive Assessment score, TMT; Trail making test.