Table 1.
Study Design | Study population | Result (95% Confidence Interval) | Referenc e |
---|---|---|---|
Case-Control Population-Based Quebec, Canada |
179 cases 179 controls |
OR=13 fold (p<.001)1 | 9 |
Case-Control Hospital-Based Northern Italy |
362 cases 1,408 controls |
OR=2.8 (1.3-6.3)2 | 91 |
Case Control Hospital-Based Louisiana, USA |
363 cases 1,234 controls |
OR=5.25 (2.08-13.21)2 | 92 |
Case-Control Population-Based USA |
484 cases 2,099 controls |
OR=3.2 (1.8-5.6) | 10 |
Case-Control Population Based Southeastern MI, USA |
247 cases 420 controls |
RR=2.49 (1.32-4.69)3 | 93 |
Case-Control Hospital-Based Texas, USA |
808 cases 808 matched controls |
OR=2.7 (1.7-4.3) | 94 |
Nested Case- Control Japan |
200 cases 2000 matched controls |
2.09 (1.01-4.33) | 95 |
Cohort United States |
3,751 cases among 1,102,308 individuals 14 years of follow-up |
RR=1.5 (1.1-2.1)3 | 11 |
Cohort Sweden |
21,000 cases among 10.2 million individuals |
RR=1.73 (1.13-2.54) | 96 |
age, sex and language (French) matched
adjusted for tobacco, dietary factors and history of diabetes and pancreatitis, crude O R 3.0
adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, ever smoking, proband ever smoking, diabetes, age of proband. 4 age-adjusted rate was equivalent