Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 12;20(7):e13416. doi: 10.1111/acel.13416

TABLE 1.

Immunolabeling measures: Drug × Sex effects within genotype groups

WT Veh WT Q1 APP/PS1 Veh APP/PS1 Q1
M ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.38 ± 0.09 0.49 ± 0.14
F ‐‐ ‐‐ 0.92 ± 0.2 b 0.97 ± 0.22
GFAP
M 1.06 ± 0.16 0.92 ± 0.22 2.23 ± 0.28 1.60 ± 0.25
F 1.22 ± 0.29 1.73 ± 0.39 3.09 ± 0.40 3.14 ± 0.28 c
Iba1
M 1.43 ± 0.60 0.91 ± 0.35 2.22 ± 1.42 1.32 ± 0.42
F 1.26 ± 0.39 2.91 ± 1.16 2.74 ± 0.55 1.63 ± 0.58
NFAT4/GFAP
M 0.53 ± 0.06 0.40 ± 0.04 0.90 ± 0.14 0.8 ± 0.14
F 0.58 ± 0.10 0.78 ± 0.16 a 1.27 ± 0.17 0.94 ± 0.15
NFAT4/DAPI
M 0.67 ± 0.13 0.74 ± 0.24 1.24 ± 0.26 1.01 ± 0.20
F 0.96 ± 0.34 0.97 ± 0.28 1.46 ± 0.23 1.31 ± 0.23

All values are expressed as mean ± SEM labeling intensity (% area occupied). ns per group are indicated in text. Approximately 46% of mice were male.

a

vs. Male WT Q134R.

b

vs. Male APP/PS1 vehicle.

c

vs. Male APP/PS1 Q134R.