Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 15;73(2):e477–e484. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa986

Table 4.

Specificity of Diagnostic Tests in Specimens Collected at Birth in Different Groups of Uninfected Infants

Cohort Testing at Birth no./No. % (95% CI)
Training cohort: Uninfected infants of infected mothers
(n = 348)
qPCR 294/296 99.3 (97.6–99.9)
Microscopy 338/338 92.6 (98.9–100.0)
IgM-TESA blot 335/346 96.8 (94.4–98.4)
IgM-SAPA test 344/348 98.9 (97.1–99.7)
Training cohort: Uninfected infants of seronegative mothers (n = 92) qPCR NP NP NP
Microscopy NP NP NP
IgM-TESA blot NP NP NP
IgM-SAPA test 90/92 97.8 (92.4–99.7)
Validation cohort: Uninfected infants of infected mothers
(n = 217)
qPCR 212/213 99.5 (97.4–99.9)
Microscopy 189/190 99.5 (97.8–100.0)
IgM-TESA blot 144/149 96.6 (92.3–98.9)
IgM-SAPA test 201/217 92.6 (88.3–95.7)
Uninfected infants from nonendemic area
(n = 186)
qPCR NP NP NP
Microscopy NP NP NP
IgM-TESA blot 186/186 100.0 (98.0–100.0)
IgM-SAPA test 184/186 98.9 (96.2–99.9)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IgM-SAPA test, immunoglobulin M shed acute-phase antigen test; IgM-TESA blot, Western blot with trypomastigote excretory-secretory antigen for the detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies; NP, not performed; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.