Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;10:e64507. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64507

Figure 1. HBV GP fusion trigger is independent of acidic pH, HSPG, and NTCP.

(A) Huh7 ‘donor’ cells transfected with the pT7HB2.7 plasmid allowing expression of hepatitis B virus glycoproteins (HBV GPs) (HBV) and a luciferase marker gene driven by the HIV-1 promoter were co-cultured with either Huh7-tat (H-tat) or Huh7-NTCP-tat (N-tat) ‘indicator’ cells that express the HIV Tat protein. After 24 hr of co-culture, the cells were treated at pH 4 (or pH 5 for VSV-G) vs pH 7 for 3 min. The luciferase activity induced by fusion between donor and indicator cells was then measured 24 hr later. A control plasmid that does not allow GP expression (Empty) was used to determine the background of luciferase expression. The Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) Gn/Gc (CCHFV) or vesicular stomatitis virus-G (VSV-G) (VSV) GPs were used as positive controls for fusion at low pH. Fusion mediated by HBV GPs with Huh7-tat cells was taken as 100%. The bars represent the means (N = 3). Error bars correspond to standard deviation. See the raw data of individual experiments in Figure 1—figure supplement 1. (B) Results of cell-cell fusion assays performed as described above in the presence of heparin at the indicated concentrations throughout the co-culture. No cytotoxicity could be detected in these conditions (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). The graphs represent the average of two independent experiments. Fusion mediated by HBV GPs with mock-treated Huh7 cells was taken as 100%. (C) CHO ‘donor’ cells transfected with the pT7HB2.7 plasmid and a luciferase marker gene driven by the HIV-1 promoter were co-cultured with either Huh7-tat (H-tat), CHO-tat (CHO wild-type [wt]), or CHO-pgsB618-tat (pgsB618) ‘indicator’ cells that express the HIV Tat protein. The luciferase activity induced by fusion between donor and indicator cells was then measured 24 hr later. A control plasmid that does not allow GP expression (Empty) was used to determine the background of luciferase expression. Fusion mediated by HBV GPs with Huh7-tat was taken as 100%. The graphs represent the average of two independent experiments. (D) Huh7 ‘donor’ cells transfected with plasmids allowing expression of L, M, or S HBV GPs alone, both L and S GPs (noM), or all HBV GPs (Wt) and a luciferase marker gene driven by the HIV-1 promoter were co-cultured with Huh7-tat or Huh7-NTCP-tat ‘indicator’ cells that express HIV Tat protein. Cell co-cultures were then processed as described above to determine cell-cell fusion activity. Fusion mediated by HBV GP at pH 7 with Huh7-tat cells was taken as 100%. The bars represent the means (N = 3). Error bars correspond to standard deviation. (E) Detection of HBV GPs at the cell surface by biotinylation. Transfected Huh7 cells were biotinylated for 30 min at 4°C and then processed biochemically. Cell lysates were subjected to streptavidin pull-down prior to western blot analysis using anti-HBsAg antibody (Murex). The molecular weight markers (kDa) are shown on the right. Calnexin detection was used as control for the cytoplasmic protein marker, showing the integrity of cell membrane, as shown in this representative western blot. (F) Relative GP expression at the cell surface as compared to Wt, quantified by adding the L+M+S signals from western blot analyses. The results are expressed as mean ± SD (N = 3). No statistical differences could be found using the Mann-Whitney test (p-value>0.05). See also the quantification of total HBV GP expression in Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

Figure 1—source data 1. HBV GP fusion trigger is independent of acidic pH and NTCP.
The values correspond to the data expressed in the graphs displayed in Figure 1A, D and F.
Figure 1—source data 2. HBV GP fusion trigger is independent of acidic pH and NTCP.
These images are of the original and uncropped gels that correspond to the blots displayed in Figure 1E. The vertical bars correspond to samples that are not described in the 'Results' section.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. HBV GP fusion trigger is independent of acidic pH and NTCP.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Huh7 ‘donor’ cells transfected with the pT7HB2.7 plasmid allowing expression of hepatitis B virus glycoproteins (HBV GPs) (HBV) and a luciferase marker gene driven by the HIV-1 promoter were co-cultured with either Huh7-tat (H-tat) or Huh7-NTCP-tat (N-tat) ‘indicator’ cells that express the HIV Tat protein. After 24 hr of co-culture, the cells were treated at pH 4 (or pH 5 for vesicular stomatitis virus-G [VSV-G]) vs pH 7 for 3 min. The luciferase activity induced by fusion between donor and indicator cells was then measured 24 hr later. A control plasmid that does not allow GP expression (Empty) was used to determine the background of luciferase expression. The Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) Gn/Gc (CCHFV) or VSV-G GPs (VSV) were used as positive controls for fusion at low pH. Results are from three independent experiments expressed as ratios of luciferase activities of the different conditions relative to those of the control conditions.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Results of cell survival after drug treatments.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

The indicated drugs were used as described in Figure 1B (heparin), Figure 3 (DNTB), and Figure 6 (NTZ, EGCG, rutin, bacitracin, and PX-12). Cell supernatants were collected immediately after treatment (post-treatment) or after a further incubation at 37°C of the treated cells (post-incubation). Cell toxicity assessment was performed with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (CytoTox-ONE; Promega) using the indicated positive and negative controls of the kit. Error bars correspond to standard deviations.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Characterization of ‘noM’ HDV particles.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A) Huh7 cells were co-transfected with pSVLD3 plasmid coding for hepatitis delta virus (HDV) ribonucleoprotein (RNP) and with plasmids encoding either the wild-type (wt) hepatitis B virus glycoproteins (HBV GPs) (Wt) or only L and S (noM). As control, pSVLD3 was co-transfected with an empty plasmid (referred to as ‘noGP’). At day 9 post-transfection, the cell supernatants were harvested and filtered, and the extracellular RNA was extracted and purified before quantifying HDV RNAs by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RTqPCR). HDV RNA levels in GE (genome equivalent) are expressed as means ± SD (N = 4) per ml of cell supernatants. (B) HDV or noM particles were used to infect Huh7-NTCP cells, which were grown for 7 days before total intracellular RNA was purified. The results of HDV RNA quantification by RTqPCR are expressed after normalization with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RNAs as means ± SD (N = 4) per ml of cell lysates containing 106 cells.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4. Total protein expression.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

(A) Cell lysates of Huh7 cells expressing the indicated wild-type (wt) or mutant glycoproteins (GPs) from Figure 1 (left) and Figure 5 (right) were subjected to western blot analysis, using anti-HBsAg antibody (Murex). The molecular weight markers (kDa) are shown on the left. Calnexin detection was used as control for the cytoplasmic protein marker, as shown in these representative western blots. The black dots indicate dimers of S, as described in the literature (Huovila et al., 1992), which are formed in the pre-Golgi compartment. (B) Relative GP expression compared to Wt, quantified from western blots using anti-HBsAg antibody. The results are expressed as mean ± SD (N = 3).