Table 3.
Results of binomial logistic regression analysis between sociodemographic data and social isolation
| Predictors | β (SE) | OR (95% CI) | P value | ||
| Sex | |||||
| Female (ref) | 0 | ||||
| Male | 0.58 | (0.05) | 1.78 | (1.60 to 1.98) | <0.001 |
| Age (years) | |||||
| 18–39 (ref) | 0 | ||||
| 40–64 | 0.55 | (0.06) | 1.73 | (1.55 to 1.93) | <0.001 |
| ≥65 | −0.08 | (0.09) | 0.92 | (0.77 to 1.10) | 0.369 |
| Occupation | |||||
| Other (ref) | 0 | ||||
| Employed | −0.20 | (0.15) | 0.82 | (0.61 to 1.09) | 0.175 |
| Homemaker | −0.04 | (0.16) | 0.96 | (0.70 to 1.32) | 0.823 |
| Student | −0.92 | (0.22) | 0.40 | (0.26 to 0.62) | <0.001 |
| Unemployed | 0.11 | (0.16) | 1.11 | (0.81 to 1.54) | 0.515 |
| Annual household income (JPY) | |||||
| ≥8.0 million (ref) | 0 | ||||
| <2.0 million | 1.05 | (0.11) | 2.85 | (2.29 to 3.54) | <0.001 |
| 2.0–3.9 million | 0.64 | (0.07) | 1.90 | (1.65 to 2.18) | <0.001 |
| 4.0–5.9 million | 0.46 | (0.06) | 1.58 | (1.40 to 1.80) | <0.001 |
| 6.0–7.9 million | 0.22 | (0.07) | 1.24 | (1.09 to 1.43) | 0.002 |
| Marital status | |||||
| Yes (ref) | 0 | ||||
| No | 0.17 | (0.07) | 1.19 | (1.04 to 1.35) | 0.010 |
| The presence of child | |||||
| Yes (ref) | 0 | ||||
| No | 0.59 | (0.06) | 1.80 | (1.60 to 2.03) | <0.001 |
R2=0.08 (Cox-Snell), 0.10 (Nagelkerke). Model χ2(13)=685.62, p<0.001.