Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 15;11:14515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93902-5

Table 2.

Comparison of FHSQ scores of the total sample, patients with foot problems and controls.

Total Group
(n = 498)
Cases
(n = 249)
Controls
(n = 249)
p value
Foot pain

76.81 ± 19.75

(0–100)

78.36 ± 19.07

(0–100)

75.25 ± 20.32

(0–100)

.082†
Foot function

82.68 ± 19.52

(0–100)

82.99 ± 18.24

(6.25–100)

82.36 ± 20.76

(0–100)

.763†
Footwear

47.20 ± 30.84

(0–100)

42.03 ± 31.99

(0–100)

52.37 ± 28.77

(0–100)

.000
General foot health

56.05 ± 24.92

(0–100)

57.66 ± 23.65

(0–100)

54.44 ± 26.08

(0–100)

.329†
General health

68.02 ± 22.95

(0–100)

79.50 ± 30.00

(10–100)

56.55 ± 19.96

(0–100)

.000
Physical activity

84.52 ± 20.59

(5.56–100)

84.26 ± 20.47

(5.56–100)

84.79 ± 20.74

(5.56–100)

.221†
Social capacity

78.82 ± 24.33

(0–100)

82.52 ± 20.06

(0–100)

75.11 ± 27.50

(0–100)

.025†
Vitality

54.73 ± 23.25

(0–100)

53.32 ± 25.28

(0–100)

56.14 ± 20.99

(0–100)

.048†

Median ± IR (range) and Mann–Whitney U test were utilised.

In all the analyses, p < .05 (with a 95% confidence interval) was considered statistically significant.