Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 15;8:179. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00971-2

Table 3.

Description of the sensor data.

Name Description Type Values
timestamp Timestamp of SDS data collected by access point in ISO 8601 format, timezone is CEST String YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss
day Event day Integer 1 = 2020-08-28
2 = 2020-08-29
3 = 2020-08-30
reporting_tagid SDS tag id reporting contact Integer 146–1176
reporting_qid Unique person identifier wearing reporting SDS Integer 11–998937
opposing_tagid SDS tag id opposing contact Integer 146–1176
opposing_qid Unique person identifier wearing opposing SDS Integer 11–998937
n_incidents Number of contacts Integer 0–224
timeslot Time slot number Integer 2–11
direction Walking directions Integer 0 = no directions
1 = unidirectional
2 = bidirectional
pre_q Completed pre-questionnaire Integer 0 = not completed
1 = completed
post_q Completed post-questionnaire Integer 0 = not completed
1 = completed
linked SDS linked to household / group members Integer 0 = not linked
1 = at least 1 linked SDS
linked_id1 SDS tag id of first linked SDS Integer 146–1176
linked_id2 SDS tag id of second linked SDS Integer 146–1157
linked_id3 SDS tag id of third linked SDS, note no groups of 4 Integer NA
location_tag SDS has fixed location in art fair, note location tags do not have a QID Integer 0 = SDS worn by visitor
1 = fixed location SDS

QID is unique per person, while tag ID refers to the SDS and was handed out to multiple visitors during the art fair. A contact between two SDSs was registered on both sensors. Each sensor sent the data to the access point with their ID as reporting ID, and the other as opposing ID. When visitors from the same household linked their SDSs, their contacts were not registered.