Table 2.
AUC analysis of potential ATB diagnostic biomarkers in the ATB-vs-LTBI and ATB-vs-HC comparisons.
| Proteina | ATB-vs-LTBI | ATB-vs-HC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | AUC | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | |
| Rv0934* | 0.735 | 97.297 | 46.154 | 0.788 | 100.000 | 51.923 |
| Rv1827* | 0.560 | 97.297 | 17.308 | 0.563 | 100.000 | 13.462 |
| Rv1860* | 0.655 | 100.000 | 25.000 | 0.637 | 100.000 | 26.923 |
| Rv3881c* | 0.634 | 97.297 | 23.077 | 0.611 | 96.296 | 30.769 |
| Rv2236c | 0.708 | 97.297 | 28.163 | 0.710 | 77.778 | 63.462 |
| Rv3248c | 0.680 | 94.595 | 25.000 | 0.491 | 59.259 | 53.846 |
| Rv3413c | 0.629 | 97.297 | 26.923 | 0.570 | 88.889 | 32.692 |
| Rv3803c | 0.674 | 94.595 | 38.462 | 0.670 | 48.148 | 82.692 |
aProteins marked with an asterisk (*) were selected as candidate biomarkers in both comparisons.