Table 4.

Results obtained by the proposed framework on the three publicly available datasets used in this study, considering fivefold cross-validation scheme.

Dataset	Fold	Accuracy (%)	Precision (%)	Recall (%)	F1-Score (%)
SIPaKMeD 2-Class	1	98.09	98.13	98.03	98.08
	2	98.67	98.75	98.54	98.63
	3	97.80	97.85	97.73	97.79
	4	98.19	98.11	98.29	98.20
	5	100.00	100.00	100.00	100.00
	$\mathit{Avg}\pm Std.Dev.$	$98.55\pm 0.78$	$98.57\pm 0.77$	$98.52\pm 0.79$	$98.54\pm 0.78$
SIPaKMeD 5-Class	1	95.60	95.60	95.73	95.66
	2	94.84	94.56	94.60	94.58
	3	95.34	95.21	95.34	95.27
	4	95.41	95.34	95.41	95.37
	5	95.96	96.00	95.81	95.90
	$\mathit{Avg}\pm Std.Dev.$	$95.43\pm 0.36$	$95.34\pm 0.48$	$95.38\pm 0.43$	$95.36\pm 0.45$
Mendeley LBC	1	98.96	98.96	98.96	98.96
	2	99.48	99.12	99.48	99.30
	3	99.12	98.96	99.12	99.04
	4	99.12	99.12	99.12	99.12
	5	99.48	99.48	99.48	99.48
	$\mathit{Avg}\pm Std.Dev.$	$99.23\pm 0.21$	$99.13\pm 0.19$	$99.23\pm 0.21$	$99.18\pm 0.19$

Avg average of the fivefolds, Std. Dev. standard deviation.