Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22;30(15):1457–1467. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddab114

Table 2.

Association of ΔAF and ΔLD with the degree of heterogeneity considering GWAS index variants with concordant and discordant heterogeneity

Heterogeneity Variable MBLM LOESS–GAM
V-value Pr (>|V|) F-value Pr (>|t|)
Concordant ΔAF EUR versus AFR 997 0.714
AMR 1122 0.206
CSA 998 0.709
EAS 1113 0.23
MID 1564 9.04E-06 1564 9.04E-06
ΔLD EUR versus AFR 577 8.21E-03 577 8.21E-03
AMR 1417 7.17E-04 1417 7.17E-04
CSA 518 2.16E-03 518 2.16E-03
EAS 1175 0.1
Discordant ΔAF EUR versus AFR 145 0.00769 6.32 0.026
AMR 108 0.338
CSA 21 5.31E-03 2.48 0.140
EAS 50 0.127
MID 69 0.486
ΔLD EUR versus AFR 31 0.0159 1.13 0.308
AMR 46 0.089
CSA 16 2.65E-03 0.11 0.744
EAS 70 0.514

V-value: the intercept value of the Theil-Sen regression; Pr (>|V|): p-value of the Theil-Sen regression slope; F-value: statistics related to the V-test; Pr(>|F): p-value for the t-test.