Table 1.
Evaluation of anastomosis types according to demographic features.
| Anastomosis type | p | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1External iliac artery end-to-side (n = 45) | 2Internal iliacartery end-to-side (n = 152) | •Internal iliac artery end-to-end (n = 3) | •Common iliac artery end-to-side (n = 3) | 3External iliac artery end-to-side, two arteries(n = 15) | 4Internal iliacartery end-to-end, two arteries(n = 10) | |||
| Age (year) | Q1 - Q3 (Median) | 28.5 - 50.5 (40) | 31 - 42 (35) | 39 - 54 (54) | 57 - 60 (58) | 32 - 50 (37) | 28.5 - 39.8 (34.5) | a0.269 |
| Mean ± SD | 40.64 ± 12.69 | 37.17 ± 9.82 | 49.00 ± 8.66 | 58.33 ± 1.53 | 40.73 ± 11.40 | 35.50 ± 8.76 | ||
| Gender; n (%) | Female | 15 (33.3) | 48 (31.6) | 0 (0) | 1 (33.3) | 5 (33.3) | 4 (40.0) | c0.938 |
| Male | 30 (66.7) | 104 (68.4) | 3 (100) | 2 (66.7) | 10 (66.7) | 6 (60.0) | ||
| Donors; n (%) | Mothers | 17 (37.8) | 68 (44.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 7 (46.7) | 4 (40.0) | d0.849 |
| Fathers | 6 (13.3) | 36 (23.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (20.0) | 4 (40.0) | c0.235 | |
| Siblings | 9 (20) | 28 (18.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (6.7) | 1 (10.0) | c0.723 | |
| Spouses | 10 (22.2) | 16 (10.5) | 3 (100) | 3 (100) | 4 (26.7) | 0 (0) | c0.048* | |
| Nonblood relativesof the patients | 1 (2.2) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | c0.531 | |
| Second-degreerelatives | 2 (4.4) | 3 (2.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (10.0) | c0.217 | |
| Early complications;n (%) | Complications ( - ) | 34 (75.6) | 113 (74.3) | 2 (66.7) | 3 (100) | 10 (66.7) | 7 (70.0) | c0.855 |
| Complications ( + ) | 11 (24.4) | 39 (25.7) | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0) | 5 (33.3) | 3 (30.0) | ||
| Late complications;n (%) | Complications ( - ) | 33 (73.3) | 122 (80.3) | 2 (66.7) | 2 (66.7) | 10 (66.7) | 5 (50.0) | c0.095 |
| Complications ( + ) | 12 (26.7) | 30 (19.7) | 1 (33.3) | 1 (33.3) | 5 (33.3) | 5 (50.0) | ||
aKruskal–Wallis test cFisher–Freeman–Halton–Exact test dPearson Ki-kare test