Table 2.
Comparison of principle endovascular techniques used in the literature and our study.
| Endovascular treatment techniques | Standard coiling | Parent artery Occlusion | Balloon-assisted TechniquesStent-assisted coiling | Stent-assisted techniques | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flow diverter systems | ||||||||
| Telescopic stenting | Flow diverter stents | |||||||
| Number of aneurysms | Our study | 7(27%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (8%) | 8(31%) | 4(15%) | 5 (19%) | 26 |
| Literature | 71(63%) | 4 (3%) | 10 (9%) | 22 (19%) | 3 (3%) | 3 (3%) | 113 | |
| Technical success rate | Our study | 100%(7/7) | - | 100%(2/2) | 100%(8/8) | % 100(4/4) | 100%(5/5) | 100% |
| Literature | 97%(69/71) | 100%(4/4) | 90%(9/10) | 100%(22/22) | 100%(3/3) | 100% (3/3) | 97% | |
| Complication rate | Our study | 14% (1/7) | - | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/8) | 0% (0/4) | 20%(1/5) | 7.6% |
| Literature | 8%(6/71) | 25%(1/4) | 10%(1/10) | 5%(1/22) | 0%(0/3) | 33% (1/3) | 8.8% | |
| Clinical success rate | Our study | 86%(6/7) | - | 100%(2/2) | 100%(8/8) | 100%(4/4) | 80%(4/5) | 92% |
| Literature | 91%(65/71) | 75%(3/4) | 90%(9/10) | 95%(21/22) | 100%(3/3) | 67% (2/3) | 91% | |