Table 3.
Characteristics of four leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata cases treated with goserelin acetate
Case No.
|
Ref.
|
Age
|
Obstetric history
|
UL history; treatments
|
OC use/HRT
|
Symptoms
|
ER/PR status
|
Treatments
|
Response
|
1 | Verguts et al[26], 2014 | 21 | Unknown | Yes; hysteroscopic resection | No/No | Abdominal discomfort | Negative/positive | Goserelin acetate and tibolone × 2 yr → ulipristal acetate × 1 yr | +, + |
2 | Nassif et al[31], 2016 | 45 | G1P1 | Yes; unknown | Yes/No | Dorsal pain | Positive/unknown | Goserelin acetate × 6 mo → Progestin × 6 mo | +, treatment for UL |
3 | Quaranta et al[19], 2018 | 60 | P3 | Yes; unknown | No/No | Abdominal discomfort and postmenopausal bleeding | Strongly positive/strongly positive | Goserelin acetate | LPD recurred within one year |
4 | Ando et al[24], 2017 | 40 | G0 | Yes; transcervical resection | No/No | Abdominal pain | Slightly positive/slightly positive | Goserelin acetate 1.8 mg monthly × 6 mo → TAH, BSO and tumor resection → letrozole | +, LPD recurred 6 mo after surgery, + |
OC: Oral contraceptives; HRT: Hormone replacement treatment; TAH: Total abdominal hysterectomy; BSO: Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; +: Successful control of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminate; LPD: Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminate; UL: Uterine leiomyoma; ER: Estrogen receptors; PR: Progesterone receptors.