TABLE 4.
Descriptive examination of the correlations and differences between other indirect methods and the measured VO2max.
Methods | Reference | Predicted VO2max | CE | t | r | ICC | MAE | MAPE (%) |
(mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) | (mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) | (mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) | ||||||
Equation 1 | Klusiewicz et al., 2016 | |||||||
Male (n = 23) | 65.7 ± 6.1 | 5.0 ± 5.6 | 4.310* | 0.568* | 0.427* | 6.0 ± 4.5 | 10.3 | |
Female (n = 22) | 59.5 ± 5.9 | 2.8 ± 3.5 | 3.701* | 0.807* | 0.723* | 3.9 ± 2.3 | 6.9 | |
All (n = 45) | 62.7 ± 6.7 | 3.9 ± 4.8 | 5.513* | 0.721* | 0.604* | 5.0 ± 3.8 | 8.6 | |
Equation 2 | Marsh, 2012 | |||||||
Male (n = 29) | 62.1 ± 2.8 | -0.2 ± 2.8 | -0.333 | 0.602* | 0.600* | 2.2 ± 1.7 | 3.5 | |
Female (n = 16) | 57.8 ± 2.6 | 2.2 ± 4.5 | 1.954 | 0.125 | 0.099 | 3.6 ± 3.8 | 6.9 | |
All (n = 45) | 60.6 ± 3.4 | 0.7 ± 3.7 | 1.238 | 0.655* | 0.615* | 2.7 ± 2.5 | 4.8 | |
Equation 3 | Marsh, 2012 | |||||||
Male (n = 29) | 64.0 ± 3.5 | 1.7 ± 2.3 | 4.116* | 0.787* | 0.704* | 2.3 ± 1.7 | 3.6 | |
Female (n = 16) | 59.2 ± 3.4 | 3.6 ± 5.2 | 2.728* | 0.008 | 0.006 | 4.8 ± 4.2 | 9.0 | |
All (n = 45) | 62.3 ± 4.2 | 2.4 ± 3.7 | 4.352* | 0.671* | 0.586* | 3.1 ± 3.0 | 5.6 |
CE, constant error, arithmetic mean of the difference between estimated and measured VO2max; t, t value from paried sample t-test; r, pearson correlation coefficient; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; MAE, mean absolute error; and MAPE, mean absolute percentage error. *Statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). Equation 1: VO2max (mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) in males = (3.2131 + 0.0076 × PWC170) / body mass, VO2max (mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) in females = (2.4138 + 0. × PWC170) / body mass. Equation 2: VO2 (mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) = (speed (m⋅min–1) × 0.2) + (gradient × speed (m⋅min–1) × 0.9) + 3.5, where the estimated maximal speed was calculated as following steps, (1) linear regression was used based on steady-state heart rate values and running speed were obtained for each stage of the submaximal running test, (2) the linear line was then extrapolated to estimated maximal heart rate (220 – age) to determine the value of estimated maximal speed. Equation 3: VO2max (mL⋅kg–1⋅min–1) = VO2-stage 4 + b (HRmax – HR-stage 4), where the VO2-stage 4 was calculated based on the steady-state HR in stage 4 of the submaximal running test as the Eq. (2), HRmax refers to estimated maximal heart rate (220 – age), and the additional coefficient b is calculated from b = (VO2-stage 4 – VO2-stage 3) / (HR-stage 4 – HR-stage 3), which is the ratio of the difference between the estimated VO2 of last two stages of submaximal running test and corresponding change of steady-state heart rate.