Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 16.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2017 Nov 29;21(5):e12633. doi: 10.1111/desc.12633

Table 2.

Results from multilevel model examining age differences in self-regulation dynamics.

Final Model

Parameters Estimates 95%CI Parameter Label
Fixed effects for PR (Eq. 2.1)
Intrinsic Dynamics for PR
baselinePR 0.45 * [0.26,0.63] Baseline
ΔbaselinePR −0.32 * [−0.51,−0.12] Age Δ in baseline
ηPR 0.26 * [0.25,0.28] Return strength
ηPR1 0.05 * [0.02,0.07] Age Δ in return strength
ζPR 0.13 * [0.09,0.16] Damping
ζPR1 0.06 * [0.00, 0.13] Age Δ in damping
Extrinsic Direct Influences for PR
βPR 0.01 [0.00,0.02] Extrinsic push
βPR1 0.01 [−0.01,0.03] Age Δ in extrinsic push
δPR 0.00 [−0.02,0.02] Extrinsic damping
δPR1 0.00 [−0.04,0.04] Age Δ in extrinsic damping
Extrinsic Indirect Influences for PR
πPR −0.20 * [−0.21,−0.18] Moderated return strength
πPR1 −0.11 * [−0.15,−0.08] Age Δ in moderated return strength
ξPR 0.12 * [0.08,0.17] Moderated damping
ξPR1 −0.10 [−0.21,0.02] Age Δ in moderated damping
Fixed effects for EP (Eq. 2.2)
Intrinsic Dynamics for EP
baselineEP 1.14 * [1.03,1.25] Baseline
ΔbaselineEP −0.10 [−0.23,0.04] Age Δ in baseline
ηEP 0.25 * [0.24,0.26] Return strength
ηEP1 0.21 * [0.19,0.24] Age Δ in return strength
ζEP −0.01 [−0.04,0.02] Damping
ζEP1 0.01 [−0.05,0.06] Age Δ in damping
Extrinsic Direct Influences for EP
βEP 0.05 * [0.03,0.06] Extrinsic push
βEP1 0.06 * [0.03,0.09] Age Δ in extrinsic push
δEP 0.01 [−0.03,0.05] Extrinsic damping
δEP1 −0.03 [−0.11,0.04] Age Δ in extrinsic damping
Extrinsic Indirect Influences for EP
πEP −0.04 * [−0.06,−0.02] Moderated return strength
πEP1 0.11 * [0.06,0.16] Age Δ in moderated return strength
ξEP −0.06 * [−0.12,0.00] Moderated damping
ξEP1 0.11 [−0.03,0.25] Age Δ in moderated damping

Random effects
σBaselinePR 0.99 [0.91,1.09] Residual variance/covariance unaccounted for by Age
σΔBaselinePR 1.01 [0.94,1.07]
σBaselineEP 0.58 [0.49,0.70]
σΔBaselineEP 0.66 [0.52,0.83]
r(φPR, φEP ) −0.45 [−0.56,−0.32]
r(φPR, φΔPR ) −0.97 [−0.98,−0.95]
r(φPR, φΔEP ) 0.30 [0.15,0.44]
r(φEP, φΔPR ) 0.45 [0.31,0.56]
r(φEP, φΔEP ) −0.92 [−0.95,−0.86]
r(φΔPR, φΔEP ) −0.34 [−0.47,−0.19]

Model Fit
AIC 4012.01
BIC 4336.44
LogLikelihood −1965.05

Note: N = 112, PR = Prepotent Response, EP = Executive Process, CI = 95% confidence interval, AIC = Akaike Information Criteria, BIC = Bayes Information Criteria

*

= p < .05