Table 2.
Results from multilevel model examining age differences in self-regulation dynamics.
Final Model | |||
---|---|---|---|
Parameters | Estimates | 95%CI | Parameter Label |
Fixed effects for PR (Eq. 2.1) | |||
Intrinsic Dynamics for PR | |||
baselinePR | 0.45 * | [0.26,0.63] | Baseline |
ΔbaselinePR | −0.32 * | [−0.51,−0.12] | Age Δ in baseline |
ηPR | 0.26 * | [0.25,0.28] | Return strength |
ηPR1 | 0.05 * | [0.02,0.07] | Age Δ in return strength |
ζPR | 0.13 * | [0.09,0.16] | Damping |
ζPR1 | 0.06 * | [0.00, 0.13] | Age Δ in damping |
Extrinsic Direct Influences for PR | |||
βPR | 0.01 | [0.00,0.02] | Extrinsic push |
βPR1 | 0.01 | [−0.01,0.03] | Age Δ in extrinsic push |
δPR | 0.00 | [−0.02,0.02] | Extrinsic damping |
δPR1 | 0.00 | [−0.04,0.04] | Age Δ in extrinsic damping |
Extrinsic Indirect Influences for PR | |||
πPR | −0.20 * | [−0.21,−0.18] | Moderated return strength |
πPR1 | −0.11 * | [−0.15,−0.08] | Age Δ in moderated return strength |
ξPR | 0.12 * | [0.08,0.17] | Moderated damping |
ξPR1 | −0.10 | [−0.21,0.02] | Age Δ in moderated damping |
Fixed effects for EP (Eq. 2.2) | |||
Intrinsic Dynamics for EP | |||
baselineEP | 1.14 * | [1.03,1.25] | Baseline |
ΔbaselineEP | −0.10 | [−0.23,0.04] | Age Δ in baseline |
ηEP | 0.25 * | [0.24,0.26] | Return strength |
ηEP1 | 0.21 * | [0.19,0.24] | Age Δ in return strength |
ζEP | −0.01 | [−0.04,0.02] | Damping |
ζEP1 | 0.01 | [−0.05,0.06] | Age Δ in damping |
Extrinsic Direct Influences for EP | |||
βEP | 0.05 * | [0.03,0.06] | Extrinsic push |
βEP1 | 0.06 * | [0.03,0.09] | Age Δ in extrinsic push |
δEP | 0.01 | [−0.03,0.05] | Extrinsic damping |
δEP1 | −0.03 | [−0.11,0.04] | Age Δ in extrinsic damping |
Extrinsic Indirect Influences for EP | |||
πEP | −0.04 * | [−0.06,−0.02] | Moderated return strength |
πEP1 | 0.11 * | [0.06,0.16] | Age Δ in moderated return strength |
ξEP | −0.06 * | [−0.12,0.00] | Moderated damping |
ξEP1 | 0.11 | [−0.03,0.25] | Age Δ in moderated damping |
Random effects | |||
σBaselinePR | 0.99 | [0.91,1.09] | Residual variance/covariance unaccounted for by Age |
σΔBaselinePR | 1.01 | [0.94,1.07] | |
σBaselineEP | 0.58 | [0.49,0.70] | |
σΔBaselineEP | 0.66 | [0.52,0.83] | |
r(φPR, φEP ) | −0.45 | [−0.56,−0.32] | |
r(φPR, φΔPR ) | −0.97 | [−0.98,−0.95] | |
r(φPR, φΔEP ) | 0.30 | [0.15,0.44] | |
r(φEP, φΔPR ) | 0.45 | [0.31,0.56] | |
r(φEP, φΔEP ) | −0.92 | [−0.95,−0.86] | |
r(φΔPR, φΔEP ) | −0.34 | [−0.47,−0.19] | |
Model Fit | |||
AIC | 4012.01 | ||
BIC | 4336.44 | ||
LogLikelihood | −1965.05 |
Note: N = 112, PR = Prepotent Response, EP = Executive Process, CI = 95% confidence interval, AIC = Akaike Information Criteria, BIC = Bayes Information Criteria
= p < .05