Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 16.
Published in final edited form as: Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jan 12;75(5):321–327. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104732

Table 2.

Baseline and 6-Month Physical Function by Intervention Group

Group Baseline 6-months Group Effect d
Sit-to-stands, sec Intervention Control 11.3 (2.0)
11.2 (2.6)
10.3 (2.2)
10.6 (2.7)
β = −0.63
p = 0.226
0.24
Fifty foot walk – usual pace, sec Intervention Control 13.6 (1.7)
14.1 (2.5)
13.4 (1.7)
14.0 (2.9)
β = 0.06
p = 0.913
0.02
Fifty foot walk – fast pace, sec Intervention Control 10.5 (1.2)
11.1 (2.0)
10.7 (1.3)
11.1 (2.2)
β = 0.07
p = 0.898
0.04
Timed up-and-go, sec Intervention Control 7.8 (0.7)
8.3 (1.6)
7.6 (1.1)
8.1 (1.4)
β = 0.25
p = 0.421
0.15
Unloaded reach, cm Intervention Control 33.6 (6.8)
33.9 (5.1)
36.1 (7.3)
34.5 (4.8)
β = 2.45
p = 0.245
0.48
Loaded reach, cm* Intervention Control 23.5 (6.7)
23.4 (7.8)
24.0 (7.1)
23.4 (5.7)
β = 0.43
p = 0.856
0.06

Data displayed as mean (SD).

β coefficients and p-values from linear regression models including group, time, education, and baseline value as covariates.

d is Cohen’s effect size

*

one control participant was unable to lift weight during loaded reach test at either assessment