Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 16.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2020 Jul 19;47(9):4101–4114. doi: 10.1002/mp.14306

Table VI.

Comparison of measurement unit mean ratios and correlation coefficients from 24 and 35 cm DSV phantoms for 0.35 T ViewRay MRIdian MRI-Linac measurements for gantry angles from 0° to 330° in 30° increments.

Comparison DSV With gradient shimming
Without gradient shimming
Mean ratio (SD) Pearson coefficient P value Mean ratio (SD) Pearson coefficient P value
pk-pk vs VRMS 24 7.702 (1.093) −0.638 0.023 5.871 (0.928) 0.946 <<0.001
35 10.979 (2.347) −0.004 0.991 7.397 (1.474) 0.692 0.010
pk-pk vs FWHM 24 3.288 (0.901) −0.371 0.230 1.809 (0.867) 0.822 <0.001
35 3.753 (0.704) 0.360 0.246 2.092 (0.761) 0.541 0.065
VRMS vs FWHM 24 0.424 (0.090) 0.707 0.008 0.304 (0.135) 0.931 <<0.001
35 0.345 (0.033) 0.560 0.054 0.279 (0.071) 0.910 <<0.001

FWHM: Full width half maximum, pk-pk: phase map peak-to-peak, VRMS: phase map volume root mean square.