Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 2;10(6):2216–2224. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2306_20

Table 3.

Student feedback on e-learning using videoconferencing platforms

Question Response 1 n (%) Response 2 n (%) Response 3 n (%) Response 4 n (%) Response 5 n (%)
How did you find google classroom as a repository for class lecture material? Extremely useful
110 (23.7%)
Quite useful
221 (47.5%)
Somewhat useful
109 (23.4%)
Not so useful
23 (4.9%)
Not at all useful
2 (0.4%)
Compared to conventional teaching method, how would you rate your OVERALL EXPERIENCE with Zoom Meet/Google Meet/Google classroom Outstanding
26 (5.6%)
Excellent
161 (34.6%)
Average
194 (41.7%)
Fair
47 (10.1%)
Poor
37 (8%)
How would you rate your SATISFACTION with using Zoom Meet/Google Meet/Google classroom as a tool for receiving medical education Extremely satisfied
49 (10.5%)
Quite satisfied
206 (44.3%)
Somewhat satisfied
125 (26.9%)
Not so satisfied
71 (15.3%)
Not at all satisfied
14 (3%)
How do you rate the UTILITY of e-learning using Zoom Meet/Google Meet/Google class room during the lockdown period Very useful
108 (23.2%)
Quite useful
150 (32.3%)
Useful
178 (38.3%)
Rarely useful
25 (5.4%)
Not useful
4 (0.9%)
You might have spoken to your friends in other medical colleges. How do you rate the utilization of e-learning using Zoom Meet/Google Meet Outstanding
97 (20.9%)
Excellent
211 (45.4%)
Average
124 (26.7%)
Fair
25 (5.4%)
Poor
8 (1.7%)
Perceived advantages (more efficient use of time) Strongly agree
60 (12.9%)
Agree
232 (49.9%)
Neither agree nor disagree
126 (27.1%)
Disagree
38 (8.2%)
Strongly disagree
9 (1.9%)
Perceived advantages (promotes acquisition of both superficial and deep learning) Strongly agree
38 (8.2%)
Agree
161 (34.6%)
Neither agree nor disagree
157 (33.8%)
Disagree
89 (19.1%)
Strongly disagree
20 (4.3%)
Perceived advantages
(better for taking class notes)
Strongly agree
66 (14.2%)
Agree
184 (39.6%)
Neither agree nor disagree
111 (23.9%)
Disagree
78 (16.8%)
Strongly disagree
26 (5.6%)
Perceived advantages
(not getting disturbed by fellow students)
Strongly agree
67 (14.4%)
Agree
222 (47.7%)
Neither agree nor disagree
113 (24.3%)
Disagree
50 (10.8%)
Strongly disagree
13 (2.8%)
Perceived advantages (engaging experience) Strongly agree
42 (9%)
Agree
219 (47.1%)
Neither agree nor disagree
134 (28.8%)
Disagree
52 (11.2%)
Strongly disagree
18 (3.9%)
Perceived disadvantages
(promotes acquisition of superficial learning rather than in-depth learning)
Strongly agree
28 (6%)
Agree
135 (29%)
Neither agree nor disagree
149 (32%)
Disagree
120 (25.8%)
Strongly disagree
33 (7.1%)
Perceived disadvantages (not interactive) Strongly agree
28 (6%)
Agree
88 (18.9%)
Neither agree nor disagree
117 (25.2%)
Disagree
193 (41.5%)
Strongly disagree
39 (8.4%)
Perceived disadvantages (limited class time) Strongly agree
14 (3%)
Agree
94 (20.2%)
Neither agree nor disagree
140 (30.1%)
Disagree
167 (35.9%)
Strongly disagree
50 (10.8%)
Perceived disadvantages (limited opportunity to ask questions to faculty members) Strongly agree
19 (4.1%)
Agree
73 (15.7%)
Neither agree nor disagree
108 (23.2%)
Disagree
203 (43.7%)
Strongly disagree
62 (13.3%)
Perceived disadvantages (internet connection is slow or interrupted) Strongly agree
112 (24.1%)
Agree
132 (28.4%)
Neither agree nor disagree
97 (20.9%)
Disagree
89 (19.1%)
Strongly disagree
35 (7.5%)
Perceived disadvantages (access to mobile device) Strongly agree
48 (10.3%)
Agree
119 (25.6%)
Neither agree nor disagree
140 (30.1%)
Disagree
114 (24.5%)
Strongly disagree
44 (9.5%)