Table 8.

Fixed effects of characteristics of service users and administration mode on P3CEQ scale or item scores; results of two-level mixed-effect linear regression model (N = 13 integrated care initiatives, N = 183–225 service users); separate analyses for each characteristic.

	PERSON-CENTREDNESS (SCALE)				CARE PLANNING OVERALL (AVERAGE Q7a–d)				FAMILY/FRIENDS INVOLVED IN DECISION-MAKING AS MUCH AS WANTED (Q11b)
	N	ESTIMATE	SE	P	N	ESTIMATE	SE	P	N	ESTIMATE	SE	P
Fixed effect of service user characteristics
Gender: female (ref. male)	225	–0.20	0.60	.74	223	–0.08	0.15	.57	185	–0.15	0.15	.32
Age (ref. 65 to 74 years)	224				222				184
– 75 to 84 years		–0.17	0.74	.82		0.34	0.18	.06		0.29	0.19	.12
– 85 years or older		0.71	0.74	.33		–0.11	0.18	.54		0.25	0.19	.19
Education (ref. no schooling or primary school)	222				220				183
– secondary school		–0.81	0.79	.30		–0.21	0.18	.26		–0.33	0.19	.08
– advanced vocational training		–1.19	0.81	.14		–0.22	0.19	.25		–0.46	0.22	.04
– high professional/academic education		–2.62	1.06	.01		–0.25	0.25	.31		–0.79	0.25	.002
Hearing problems (ref. no)	223	–0.01	0.57	.99	221	–0.04	0.14	.79	184	0.13	0.14	.35
Visual problems (ref. no)	223	0.83	0.59	.16	221	–0.08	0.14	.56	184	–0.09	0.15	.54
Cognitive problems (ref. no)	222	–2.43	0.86	.005	220	–0.18	0.22	.40	183	–0.21	0.22	.35
Mental health problems (ref. no)	222	0.32	0.60	.60	220	0.09	0.15	.54	183	0.12	0.16	.45
Fixed effect of administration characteristics
Mode of administering: other (ref. face-to-face)	225	2.82	1.61	.08	223	–0.29	0.37	.43	185	–0.26	0.40	.51
Carer: present (ref. not present)	225	–1.45	0.78	.07	223	–0.07	0.19	.73	185	0.17	0.20	.39
In combination with qualitative interview (ref. no)	225				223				185
– interview before P3CEQ		–1.53	1.13	.17		–0.13	0.23	.57		0.25	0.28	.37
– interview after P3CEQ		–1.33	0.73	.07		–0.00	0.17	.98		–0.02	0.18	.90