Author |
Study |
Subjects |
Summary of findings |
O’Brien et al. |
[123I]FP- CIT-SPECT |
33HV, 34 AD, 23 DLB, 38 PD without dementia, 36 PDD |
Markedly reduced FP-CIT binding in the caudate and anterior and posterior putamen in DLB when compared to AD and HV [26]. |
Walker et al. |
[123I]FP- CIT-SPECT |
Eight DLB, nine AD, three other pathology |
[123I]FP- CIT-SPECT significantly increased the diagnostic accuracy while differentiating between DLB and other pathologies with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 100% [27]. |
McKeith et al. |
[123I]FP- CIT-SPECT |
94 probable DLB, 57 possible DLB 147 non-DLB dementia, 28 patients without any diagnosis |
Low DAT binding evaluated by [123I]FP- CIT-SPECT has a very high diagnostic correlation with a diagnosis of DLB [28]. |
Pardini et al. |
[123I]FP- CIT-SPECT |
12 HV, 18 DLB, 21 AD |
Higher nigroputaminal FA values in DLB patients compared to AD and HV [25]. |
Chang et al. |
99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer (ECD) SPECT |
17 DLB, 16 PD, 10 HV |
DLB group showed marked hypoperfusion in the frontal, parietal, thalamus, temporal regions when compared to HV [29]. |
Morgan et al. |
[123I]FP- CIT-SPECT |
12 FTD, 10 DLB, 9 AD |
While SPECT scan displayed an excellent specificity of 89% in the AD group, in the FTD group the specificity reduced to 67% [30]. |