Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254629

Table 2. Accuracy of hemoglobin assessment devices compared to reference hemoglobin.

Hgb Assessment N (289) Mean (SD) (g/dL) Range (g/dL) % Anemica Mean Difference (SD) with reference Hgb (g/dL)b Upper and Lower Levels of Agreement Clinically acceptable performance, % (+/-1.0 g/dL)c
Apple® Phone 289 12.0 (1.4) 7.2–16.7 53.3% -1.6 (2.0)* -5.6, 2.4 31.5%
Android® Phone 289 12.9 (1.6) 8.2–16.8 32.9% -0.7 (2.0)* -4.7, 3.3 34.6%
Masimo Pronto® 286 13.3 (1.5) 9.3–16.9 18.3% -0.4 (1.6)* -3.7, 2.8 49.5%
HemoCue® Hb-301 287 14.0 (1.9) 6.6–18.3 8.7% 0.4 (0.7)* -1.0, 1.8 90.3%
HemoCue® Hb-801 288 13.9 (1.8) 6.3–17.9 10.4% 0.2 (0.6)* -1.1, 1.5 93.4%
Reference Hgbc 289 13.7 (1.8) 5.9–18.4 12.5% Ref. Ref. Ref.

a Based off WHO cutoffs per age and sex for any level of anemia: children < 5y: <11.0 g/dL; children 5-11y: <11.5 g/dL; children 12-14y & Women (non-pregnant) ≥ 15y: <12.0 g/dL; men ≥15y: <13.0 g/dL.

b Significant difference from reference Hgb reference (H0 = 0 and α = 0.05) *p< 0.0001.

C Clinically acceptable performance defined as percentage of values within ± 1 g/dL of reference Hgb.