. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 16.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Neurosci. 2016 Dec 20;127(10):841–848. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2016.1269088

Table 2.

Mixed effects models: Training durability and effect of training dose on Useful Field of View performance.

	Analysis 1: Training Durability		Analysis 2: Effect of Training Dosage
	No Growth Model	Unconditional Growth Model	No Growth Model	Conditional Growth Model
Value	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)
−2LL	1508.82	1485.28	3167.34	3126.16
AIC	1514.82	1493.28	3173.34	3134.16
Parameters	3	4	3	4
Fixed Effects
Intercept	401.59 (38.80)^***	460.48 (40.40)^***	391.83 (27.17)^***	427.73 (27.95)^***
Time	-----	−5.26 (.99)^***	-----	-----
InSightHours	-----	-----	-----	−3.63 (.64)^***
Random Effects
Intercept	57520.90 (14200.30)^***	60762.62 (14295.61)^***	57075.50 (9866.60)^***	58906.38 (9914.22)^***
Residual	20996.53 (3627.50)^***	14677.90 (2544.82)^***	19925.48 (2336.19)^***	16352.48 (1924.85)^***

Note.

^***

p<.001. Analysis 1, n = 44, only those randomized to immediate training. Analysis 2, n = 87, the entire sample regardless of randomization or adherence. Those with missing data were included in the models.