Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;89(4):288–300. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000634

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Predicting Abstinence from Baseline Characteristics

Aftercare (n=527) Outpatient (n=617)
CBT (n=266) MET (n=216) CBT (n=301) MET (n=316)
b SE b SE b SE b SE
Intercept 3.77 3.68 0.68 1.99 −7.56 * 3.45 1.83 3.47
Baseline Covariates
Female 0.33 0.36 0.70 * 0.38 −0.71 * 0.33 0.27 0.30
Age 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 −0.00 0.01 −0.00 0.01
Cognitive Functioning: Shipley-Hartford (CFS) −0.00 0.06 −0.08 0.07 −0.01 0.06 −0.07 0.06
State-Trait Anger Scale (TAS) −0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.02
Religious Background and Beliefs (RBB) 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
Psychosocial Functioning Inventory (PFI) −2.41 * 1.09 −1.58 0.90 1.90 1.03 −0.83 0.91
Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale-Confidence (AASE-C) −0.21 0.24 −0.13 0.23 0.51 0.35 −0.53 0.30
Alcohol Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale-Temptation (AASE-T) −0.36 * 0.16 −0.08 0.15 0.15 0.22 −0.24 0.19
Interpersonal Dependency Instrument (IDI) 0.01 0.02 −0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 −0.04 * 0.02
Consequences of Drinking Scale −1.05 0.77 -a -a 0.33 0.64 −0.21 0.75
Number of Drinks per Drinking Day 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.15 0.23 0.13
Percent Days Abstinent 0.92 * 0.36 0.55 0.39 0.41 0.37 −0.10 0.35
Addiction Severity Index (ASI) Psychiatric Status −0.45 0.71 −2.11 ** 0.74 0.46 0.73 −0.78 0.74
Alcoholics Anonymous Involvement (AAI) −0.69 0.37 0.24 0.36 −0.06 0.34 0.36 0.32
Social Supports-Family 0.09 0.10 −0.16 0.09 −0.17 0.09 0.02 0.08
Social Supports-Friends −0.02 0.09 −0.05 0.09 −0.11 0.09 −0.08 0.09
Readiness to Change (URICA) 0.12 0.11 −0.03 0.08 0.23 ** 0.08 0.14 0.09
Type A versus B Alcoholism 0.04 0.34 −0.00 0.31 0.74 * 0.33 0.01 0.30
Seeking of Noetic Goals (SONG) −0.00 0.01 −0.00 0.01 −0.01 0.01 −0.01 0.01

Note: P-values refer to the significance of the regression weights for the predictive models.

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < 0.01

a

Variable for consequences of drinking was eliminated from the model for participants in the aftercare sample receiving MET due to a lack of variability in the variable among this group.