Table 5.

Comparison and error analysis of current work with published works Ishak et al.⁶⁴ and Gholinia et al.⁶⁵ when $S=0,t=0,K_s=0,F_r=0$. It is observed from the error analysis (Ishak et al.⁶⁴ and present work) for growing values of magnetic parameter M the error is increased, while it is constant for the second case (Gholinia et al.⁶⁵ and present work). It is noticed for the seconds case that the result is approximately equal, and less error is observed here.

$\text{M}$	$-f^{″}(1)$
	64	Present result	Error %	65	Present result	Error %
0.00	2.4174	2.4021	+ 0.000153%	2.4023	2.4021	+ 0.000002%
0.01	2.4199	2.4023	+ 0.000176%	2.4025	2.4023	+ 0.000002%
0.05	2.4296	2.4100	+ 0.000196%	2.4101	2.4100	+ 0.000001%
0.10	2.4417	2.4196	+ 0.000221%	2.4198	2.4196	+ 0.000002%
0.50	2.5352	2.4986	+ 0.000366%	2.4988	2.4986	+ 0.000002%