Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 16;11:14592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93661-3

Table 1.

Topological analysis—degree, betweenness, closeness centrality and cluster analysis of the network analyzed using Cytohubba plugin.

(A) Ranked by degree (B) Ranked by betweenness method (C) Ranked by closeness method (D) Ranked by MCC method
Rank Node Score Rank Node Score Rank Node Score Rank Node Score
1 LFY 21 1 NIA1 3936 1 LFY 39.2159 1 ZEP 725,762
2 ZEP 12 2 ZEP 3694.22 2 FIE2 32.406 1 GAF1 725,762
2 GAF1 12 3 LFY 3602.76 3 GAF1 31.9071 3 EXPA1 725,761
4 EXPA1 11 4 NCED1 3534 4 NFYB9 31.0825 3 RAP23 725,761
4 RAP3 11 5 MOCOS 3480 5 ZEP 30.1262 5 HK2 725,760
6 HK2 10 6 GAF1 3319.09 6 MADS2 29.5825 5 At4g13710 725,760
6 At4g13710 10 7 FIE2 2807.91 7 EMF2 29.4159 5 BAM1 725,760
6 BAM1 10 8 E2FB 1994.8 7 MAD16 29.4159 5 SL1 725,760
6 SL1 10 9 PHSH 1609.17 9 EXPA1 29.1833 5 GH3.8 725,760
6 GH3.8 10 10 ANT 734.21 10 AP2 28.5762 10 SCL7 362,880