. 2021 May 3;320(6):E1119–E1137. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00629.2020

Table 3.

Fecal microbiota: statistically significant differences of relative abundance at family level

Phylum	Family	Means ± SE and adj. P value
Phylum	Family	HFD-T63 vs. HFD	HFD-T63 vs. ND
Bacteroidetes	Bacteroidaceae	NS	0.97 ± 0.42% vs. 6.06 ± 0.59%
	Bacteroidaceae	NS	adj. P < 0.0001
	Porphyromonadaceae	15.21 ± 1.62% vs. 6.40 ± 1.48%	15.21 ± 1.62% vs. 34.89 ± 2.29%
	Porphyromonadaceae	adj. P = 0.0056	adj. P < 0.0001
	Prevotellaceae	NS	0.83 ± 0.71% vs. 5.72 ± 1.01%
	Prevotellaceae	NS	adj. P = 0.0031
Firmicutes	Lachnospiraceae	16.50 ± 1.99% vs. 25.40 ± 1.82%	NS
	Lachnospiraceae	adj. P = 0.0167	NS
	Ruminococcaceae	NS	16.28 ± 1.57% vs. 5.02 ± 2.22%
	Ruminococcaceae	NS	adj. P = 0.0027
	Streptococcaceae	NS	0.92 ± 0.16% vs. 0.04 ± 0.23%
	Streptococcaceae	NS	adj. P = 0.0210
Proteobacteria	Sutterellaceae	1.55 ± 0.17% vs. 0.33 ± 0.16%	NS
Proteobacteria	Sutterellaceae	adj. P = 0.0004	NS

Expressed as % of relative abundance and adjusted P values. Values as means ± SE. N = 6–11 animals for all measurements. HFD, high-fat diet; NS, not significantly different.