. 2021 May 3;320(6):E1119–E1137. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00629.2020

Table 4.

Fecal microbiota: statistically significant differences of relative abundance at genus level

Phylum	Family	Genus	Means ± SE and adj. P value
Phylum	Family	Genus	HFD-T63 vs. HFD	HFD-T63 vs ND
Actinobacteria	Coriobacteriaceae	Enterorhabdus	NS	2,13 ± 0,24% vs. 0.49 ± 0.34%
Actinobacteria	Coriobacteriaceae	Enterorhabdus	NS	adj. P = 0,0041
Bacteroidetes	Bacteroidaceae	Bacteroides	NS	0.97 ± 0.42% vs. 6.06 0.59%
	Bacteroidaceae	Bacteroides	NS	adj. P < 0.0001
	Porphyromonadaceae	Barnesiella	9.36 ± 1.10% vs. 3.12 ± 1.00%	9.36 ± 1.10% vs. 16.55 ± 1.55%)
	Porphyromonadaceae	Barnesiella	adj. P = 0.0029	adj. P < 0.0055
	Prevotellaceae	Prevotella	NS	0.04 ± 0.14% vs. 3.14 ± 0.20%
	Prevotellaceae	Prevotella	NS	adj. P = 0.0001
Firmicutes	Lachnospiraceae	Clostridium_XIVa	NS	1.02 ± 0.23% vs. 2.45 ± 1.82%
		Clostridium_XIVa	NS	adj. P = 0.0069
		Clostridium_XIVb	0.29 ± 0.08% vs. 0.58 ± 1.82%	NS
		Clostridium_XIVb	adj. P = 0.0432	NS
		Dorea	0.50 ± 0.77% vs. 4.09 ± 0.70%	NS
		Dorea	adj. P = 0.0128	NS
		Ruminococcus2	0.73 ± 0.07% vs. 0.07 ± 0.06%	0.73 ± 0.07% vs. 0.14 ± 0.10%
		Ruminococcus2	adj. P < 0.0001	adj. P = 0.0008
	Ruminococcaceae	Anaerotruncus	0.01 ± 0.02% vs. 0.13 ± 0.02%	NS
		Anaerotruncus	adj. P = 0.0029	NS
		Butyricicoccus	0.09 ± 0.02% vs. 0.01 ± 0.02%	NS
		Butyricicoccus	adj. P = 0.0161	NS
		Pseudoflavonifractor	0.23 ± 0.07% vs. 0.55 ± 0.06%	NS
		Pseudoflavonifractor	adj. P = 0.0128	NS
		Ruminococcus	NS	0.00 ± 0.04% vs. 0.26 ± 0.05%
		Ruminococcus	NS	adj. P = 0.0030
	Streptococcaceae	Streptococcus	NS	0.92 ± 0.16% vs. 0.04 ± 0.23%
	Streptococcaceae	Streptococcus	NS	adj. P = 0.0224
Proteobacteria	Sutterellaceae	Parasutterella	1.55 ± 0.17% vs. 0.33 ± 0.16%	NS
Proteobacteria	Sutterellaceae	Parasutterella	adj. P = 0.0004	NS

Expressed as % of relative abundance and adjusted p values. Values as means ± SE. N = 6–11 animals for all measurements. HFD, high-fat diet; NS, not significantly different.