Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 18;125(6):2237–2263. doi: 10.1152/jn.00588.2020

Table 3.

Results of pairwise comparisons between mean weights in ROIs shown in Fig. 5C

Subject Group Pairwise Comparison ROI t Value Cohen’s d P value
Nonmusicians 1 Anterior nonprimary 15.91 5.03 6.75E-08
  Primary
2 Anterior nonprimary 8.99 2.84 8.61E-06
  Lateral nonprimary
3 Posterior nonprimary 7.25 2.29 4.81E-05
  Primary
4 Posterior nonprimary 3.84 1.21 0.0040
  Lateral nonprimary
 
Musicians 1 Anterior nonprimary 11.40 3.61 1.19E-06
  Primary
2 Anterior nonprimary 7.66 2.42 3.14E-05
  Lateral nonprimary
3 Posterior nonprimary 4.49 1.42 0.0015
  Primary
4 Posterior nonprimary 2.72 0.86 0.0237
  Lateral nonprimary

Component weights were first averaged over hemispheres, and significance between ROI pairs was evaluated using paired t tests (n = 10). Note that because of our prior hypotheses and the significance of the omnibus F test, we did not correct for multiple comparisons. ROI, region of interest.