Table 5.
Selected descriptive characteristics of case facilities
| Facility # | County/District | Facility Type* | Ownership | Facility Investment Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya | ||||
| 1 | Garissa | Provincial Hospital | Government | CS |
| 2 | Isiolo | District Hospital | Government | CS |
| 3 | Mandera | District Hospital | Government | CS |
| 4 | Marsabit | Dispensary | Private-not-for-profit | CS |
| 5 | Tana River | Health Center | Government | CS |
| 6 | Embu | Health Center | Government | Maintenance |
| Uganda | ||||
| 7 | Bulambuli | Health Center | Government | CS |
| 8 | Pader | Health Center | Government | CS |
| 9 | Luuka | Health Center | Government | CS |
| 10 | Kampala | Clinic | Private for profit | CS |
| 11 | Amuru | Health Center | Private-not-for-profit | Maintenance |
| 12 | Kampala | Hospital | Government | CS |
| 13 | Budadiria | Health Center | Government |
Inconsistent (CS/Maintenance) |
aIn Uganda, a 7th facility was added after it was found that Budadiri Health Center did not undergo GP, but instead experienced similar effects to transition due to gaps between IP support