Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 16;20:146. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01342-2

Table 2.

Association of TyG index with baPWV at baseline and baPWV progression in linear models

TyG index Model 1 Model 2
β(95% CI) P value β(95% CI) P value
baPWV at baseline
 Per 1 unit increase 75 (66–85)  < 0.001 39 (29–48)  < 0.001
 Q1 (6.81–8.10) Reference Reference
 Q2 (8.10–8.52) 36 (18–55)  < 0.001 19 (2–36) 0.032
 Q3 (8.52–9.02) 88 (69–110)  < 0.001 50 (32–67)  < 0.001
 Q4 (9.02–13.17) 140 (120–160)  < 0.001 71 (52–90)  < 0.001
baPWV progression
 Per 1 unit increase 0.42 (0.31–0.54)  < 0.001 0.29 (0.17–0.42)  < 0.001
 Q1 (6.81–8.10) Reference Reference
 Q2 (8.10–8.52) 0.41 (0.19–0.64)  < 0.001 0.34 (0.11–0.57) 0.003
 Q3 (8.52–9.02) 0.67 (0.44–0.91)  < 0.001 0.52 (0.29–0.76)  < 0.001
 Q4 (9.02–13.17) 0.72 (0.48–0.96)  < 0.001 0.45 (0.20–0.71)  < 0.001

N = 6028; TyG index, triglyceride–glucose index; baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; CI, confidence interval; Q, quartiles

Model 1, adjusted for age and sex at baseline

Model 2, adjusted for variables in model 1 plus smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, MAP, diabetes, hs-CRP, and BMI at baseline