Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 17;29:94. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00901-6

Table 2.

The association and accuracy between the different CT scoring systems and GOS 1–3 (unfavourable outcome) versus GOS 4–5 (favorable outcome)

Prognostic CT scoring system Pseudo-R2 AUC (95% CI)
Marshall CT classification 0,01 0,54 (0,45 – 0,63)
Rotterdam scoring system 0,06 0,61 (0,53 – 0,70)
Helsinki CT score 0,10 0,63 (0,54 – 0,71)
Stockholm CT score 0,15 0,70 (0,61 – 0,78)