Table 2.

Estimated total effects of the MapSan intervention on intermediary outcomes from grouped path analyses

Compounds with 20 members or fewer	Unstandardised coefficient	95% CI	p-value
➔ Accessibility (direct)	-0.053	(-0.080, -0.026)	<0.001
➔ Collective cleaning (indirect)	0.022	(0.007, 0.036)	0.003
➔ Latrine cleanliness	0.40	(0.32, 0.47)	<0.001
Direct	0.39	(0.32, 0.47)	<0.001
Indirect: via collective cleaning	0.004	(0.001, 0.007)	0.020
➔ Privacy (direct)	0.69	(0.62, 0.75)	<0.001
➔ Latrine maintenance (direct)	0.45	(0.38, 0.52)	<0.001
➔ Soap/water at HWF (indirect)	0.016	(-0.034, 0.066)	0.519
➔ HWWS (indirect)	0.012	(-0.025, 0.049)	0.520
Compounds with more than 20 members	Unstandardised coefficient	95% CI	p-value
➔ Collective cleaning	0.077	(0.009, 0.15)	0.027
Indirect: via cleaning rota	0.044	(0.001, 0.087)	0.046
Indirect: via individual cleaning	0.033	(-0.013, 0.079)	0.157
➔ Latrine cleanliness	0.41	(0.20, 0.62)	<0.001
Direct	0.40	(0.18, 0.61)	<0.001
Indirect: via collective cleaning	0.016	(-0.003, 0.035)	0.105
➔ Repairs (indirect)	0.044	(-0.007, 0.095)	0.090
➔ Privacy	0.67	(0.50, 0.84)	<0.001
Direct	0.66	(0.48, 0.84)	<0.001
Indirect: via repairs	0.009	(-0.004, 0.022)	0.161
➔ Latrine maintenance (direct)	0.72	(0.55, 0.88)	<0.001
➔ HWWS (indirect)	-0.16	(-0.26, -0.048)	0.004

Total effects subdivided into direct and/or indirect effects. Indirect effects are calculated as the product of all coefficients in a pathway. For example, the indirect effect on latrine cleanliness in small compounds is calculated 0.87 * 0.13 * 0.19 * 0.19 = 0.004

Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, HWF handwashing facility, HWWS handwashing with soap