Table 4.
Distribution and adequacy of judgments when the joint domain is split according to various outcomes
| Judgments for domains that were split for various outcomes | Whole sample | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | Different | All the same | ||||||||||
| Types of outcomes | N | (%N) | Adeq | N | (%N) | Adeq | N | (%N) | Adeq | N | (%N) | Adeq |
| All outcomesa | 248 | (40%) | 40% | 76 | (37%) | 74% | 172 | (41%) | 26% | 2634 | 83% | 58% |
| Objectiveb | 72 | (12%) | 75% | 7 | (3%) | 57% | 65 | (16%) | 77% | 97 | 3% | 81% |
| Subjective | 300 | (48%) | 50% | 121 | (59%) | 49% | 179 | (43%) | 50% | 438 | 14% | 57% |
| Total | 620 | 49% | 204 | 58% | 416 | 44% | 3169 | 59% | ||||
Adeq = Adequacy; aAll or not specified outcomes; bobjectively measured / subject independent