Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 15;9:e11761. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11761

Table 2. Differences in CPR performance based on instruction method (N = 24).

Audio
instruction
Video instruction P-valuea
Chest
compressions
Score (%) 76.67 ± 32.55 86.58 ± 16.09 .621
Frequency 96.92 ± 12.33 121.42 ± 17.23 .002
Average depth (mm) 52.17 ± 12.10 53.67 ± 5.30 .487
Relaxation rate (%) 71.67 ± 34.55 90.83 ± 16.39 .063
Implementation rate (%) 47.08 ± 7.79 62.67 ± 12.75 .001
Hand position accuracy (5) 86.25 ± 28.56 98.42 ± 5.49 .074
Compression speed (times/min) 108.58 ± 3.60 104.50 ± 7.19 .099
Hands-off time 17.08 ± 2.71 10.83 ± 2.92 .000
Artificial
respiration
Score (%) 57.42 ± 37.59 73.58 ± 33.04 .505
Total respiration (times) 3.50 ± 2.20 5.50 ± 2.75 .048
Total average amount (ml) 370.75 ± 193.67 430.50 ± 147.10 .435
Breathing at the appropriate volume (%) 57.75 ± 45.63 72.42 ± 31.03 .929
Speed (times/min) 1.58 ± 1.17 5.58 ± 1.44 .081
Total score 19.25 ± 11.85 63.17 ± 24.10 .000

Notes.

a

Statistical significance was measured by the Mann–Whitney U-test.