Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 30;33(3):308–322. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.03.03

Table 2. Relationship between ME2 expression and clinicopathological indicators in breast cancer.

Variables No. of patients examined Expression of ME2 protein [n (%)] χ2 P
High (N=63) Low (N=37)
ME2, malic enzyme 2; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
Age (year) 1.401 0.166
 <50 60 35 (58.3) 25 (41.7)
 ≥50 40 28 (70.0) 12 (30.0)
T staging 1.120 0.200
 Tis+T1 34 19 (55.9) 15 (44.1)
 T2+T3 66 44 (66.7) 22 (33.3)
Lymph node metastasis 5.405 0.016
 No 58 31 (53.4) 27 (46.6)
 Yes 42 32 (76.2) 10 (23.8)
Pathological staging 4.118 0.033
 0+I+IIA 60 33 (55.0) 27 (45.0)
 IIB+III 40 30 (75.0) 10 (25.0)
Vascular cancer embolus 5.596 0.014
 No 83 48 (57.8) 35 (42.2)
 Yes 17 15 (88.2) 2 (11.8)
ER status 0.018 0.530
 Negative 37 23 (62.2) 14 (37.8)
 Positive 63 40 (63.5) 23 (36.5)
PR status 2.581 0.081
 Negative 40 29 (72.5) 11 (27.5)
 Positive 60 34 (56.7) 26 (43.3)
HER-2 status 0.429 0.807
 Negative 42 25 (59.5) 17 (40.5)
 Positive 36 24 (66.7) 12 (33.3)
 Not available 22 14 (63.6) 8 (36.4)
Ki67 index (%) 0.249 0.395
 ≤14 24 14 (58.3) 10 (41.7)
 >14 75 48 (64.0) 27 (36.0)