Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;37(7):2111–2123. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02200-8

Table 3.

Post-hoc pairwise comparisons ANOVA for drift compensation and wall layer

Image parameter Mean difference GLS (%)
Drift compensation on
 Endocardial-midwall − 1.9% p < 0.001
 Midwall-epicardial − 1.6% p < 0.001
 Endocardial–epicardial − 3.6% p < 0.001
Drift compensation off
 Endocardial-midwall − 2.1% p < 0.001
 Midwall-epicardial − 1.7% p < 0.001
 Endocardial–epicardial − 3.8% p < 0.001
Endocardial layer
 Drift compens. off–on 0.2% p = 0.061
Midwall layer
 Drift compens. off–on 0.4% p = 0.003
Epicardial layer
 Drift compens. off–on 0.5% p = 0.001

ANOVA Analysis of variance; Drift compens. Drift compensation; GLS Global longitudinal strain