Table 3.
Post-hoc pairwise comparisons ANOVA for drift compensation and wall layer
Image parameter | Mean difference GLS (%) | |
---|---|---|
Drift compensation on | ||
Endocardial-midwall | − 1.9% | p < 0.001 |
Midwall-epicardial | − 1.6% | p < 0.001 |
Endocardial–epicardial | − 3.6% | p < 0.001 |
Drift compensation off | ||
Endocardial-midwall | − 2.1% | p < 0.001 |
Midwall-epicardial | − 1.7% | p < 0.001 |
Endocardial–epicardial | − 3.8% | p < 0.001 |
Endocardial layer | ||
Drift compens. off–on | 0.2% | p = 0.061 |
Midwall layer | ||
Drift compens. off–on | 0.4% | p = 0.003 |
Epicardial layer | ||
Drift compens. off–on | 0.5% | p = 0.001 |
ANOVA Analysis of variance; Drift compens. Drift compensation; GLS Global longitudinal strain