Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 5;11:637681. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.637681

Table 3.

Results of the meta-regression analysis of DWI for discriminating benign and malignant IPMN.

Covariates Subgroup Studies (n) Meta-analytic summary estimates
Sensitivity P Specificity p
(95% CI)
(95% CI)
Study enrollment Consecutive enrollment 1 0.79 (0.59–0.99) 0.82 0.82 (0.54–1.00) 0.36
NA 5 0.73 (0.64–0.82) 0.95 (0.88–1.00)
Reader experience Available 4 0.73 (0.62–0.83) 0.13 0.95 (0.85–1.00) 0.32
NA 2 0.78 (0.63–0.92) 0.95 (0.83–1.00)
Number of readers n = 1 4 0.78 (0.70–0.85) 0.81 0.86 (0.81–0.92) 0.07
n = 2 2 0.66 (0.49–0.82) 1.00 (1.00–1.00)
Magnetic strength 1.5T 3 0.77 (0.65–0.90) 0.11 0.97 (0.91–1.00) 0.71
3T 3 0.72 (0.60–0.85) 0.91 (0.79–1.00)
Max value of b value ≥1,000 3 0.77 (0.67–0.87) 0.05 0.90 (0.78–1.00) 0.08
<1,000 3 0.71 (0.58–0.84) 0.97 (0.91–1.00)
Thickness of DWI 5 mm 2 0.78 (0.68–0.88) 0.02* 0.85 (0.79–0.91) 0.19
7 mm 4 0.72 (0.62–0.82) 0.97 (0.94–1.00)
DWI parameter quantitative DWI 3 0.72 (0.60–0.84) 0.21 0.97 (0.92–1.00) 0.01*
qualitative DWI 3 0.77 (0.68–0.85) 0.86 (0.80–0.92)

*Denotes a statistical significance.

DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; NA, not available.