Table 3.

Nonparametric Correlations (Spearman's rho) between YouTube multimedia affordances and learners' perspectives on its use inside and outside writing classes and learners' writing accuracy development.

			Q1	Q2	Q3	Q5	Q6	Q7	Q8	Q9
Writing Accuracy Metrics	No. of Errors per T-Unit	Correlation Coefficient (rs)	-0.490	-.590∗	-0.405	-.569∗	-.643∗	-0.514	-.637∗	-0.497
		Sig. (p)	0.075	0.026	0.151	0.034	0.013	0.060	0.014	0.071
	No. of errors per 100 words	Correlation Coefficient (rs)	-.600∗	-.662∗∗	-0.512	-.618∗	-.712∗∗	-.534∗	-.685∗∗	-.589∗
		Sig. (p)	0.023	0.010	0.061	0.018	0.004	0.049	0.007	0.027
	Target-like use of vocabulary	Correlation Coefficient (rs)	-0.421	-.575∗	-.557∗	-0.527	-.683∗∗	-.541∗	-.623∗	-.713∗∗
		Sig. (p)	0.134	0.031	0.039	0.053	0.007	0.046	0.017	0.004
	Percentage of target-like verbal morphology	Correlation Coefficient (rs)	.555∗	0.398	0.354	0.458	0.516	0.406	0.524	0.410
		Sig. (p)	0.039	0.159	0.214	0.099	0.059	0.150	0.055	0.145
	Percentage of target-like use of articles	Correlation Coefficient (rs)	.575∗	0.447	.557∗	.622∗	.743∗∗	.623∗	.697∗∗	.583∗
		Sig. (p)	0.031	0.109	0.039	0.017	0.002	0.017	0.006	0.029
	Ratio of error-free clauses	Correlation Coefficient (rs)	.666∗∗	.607∗	.608∗	.654∗	.788∗∗	.650∗	.717∗∗	.713∗∗
		Sig. (p)	0.009	0.021	0.021	0.011	0.001	0.012	0.004	0.004

∗. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

∗∗. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).