Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 5;15:671121. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.671121

TABLE 1.

Simulated low-vision conditions: scaling factors (a and b), expected VA and CS Reductions, expected VA and CS values, and measured VA and CS values (mean [standard deviation]) in the normally sighted young group.

Filter Horizontal scaling a Vertical scaling b Expected VA reduction Expected CS reduction Expected VA Expected CS Measured VA Measured CS
0* 1.000 1.000 0.00 0.00 −0.24 2.13 −0.09 [0.02] 2.13 [0.01]
1 0.288 0.288 0.60 −0.54 0.36 1.59 0.28 [0.01] 1.58 [0.02]
2 0.157 0.157 0.90 −0.80 0.66 1.33 0.62 [0.01] 1.33 [0.02]
3 0.086 0.086 1.20 −1.06 0.97 1.07 0.97 [0.01] 0.99 [0.02]
4 0.048 0.048 1.51 −1.31 1.27 0.82 1.31 [0.02] 0.64 [0.02]
5 0.027 0.027 1.81 −1.54 1.57 0.59 1.72 [0.01] 0.10 [0.02]
6 0.250 1.000 0.60 −0.07 0.36 2.05 0.25 [0.02] 2.11 [0.02]
7 0.134 0.534 0.90 −0.31 0.66 1.81 0.56 [0.01] 1.80 [0.03]
8 0.072 0.288 1.20 −0.57 0.97 1.55 0.93 [0.02] 1.44 [0.02]
9 0.039 0.157 1.51 −0.83 1.27 1.29 1.27 [0.03] 0.95 [0.07]
10 0.022 0.086 1.81 −1.09 1.57 1.03 1.67 [0.02] 0.35 [0.04]
11 0.267 0.534 0.60 −0.27 0.36 1.86 0.26 [0.01] 1.91 [0.04]
12 0.144 0.288 0.90 −0.54 0.66 1.59 0.57 [0.01] 1.60 [0.03]
13 0.078 0.157 1.20 −0.80 0.97 1.33 0.96 [0.02] 1.23 [0.03]
14 0.043 0.086 1.51 −1.06 1.27 1.07 1.30 [0.02] 0.72 [0.03]
15 0.024 0.048 1.81 −1.31 1.57 0.82 1.68 [0.01] 0.27 [0.03]
16 0.314 0.157 0.60 −0.80 0.36 1.33 0.30 [0.02] 1.26 [0.07]
17 0.172 0.086 0.90 −1.06 0.66 1.07 0.65 [0.03] 1.01 [0.06]
18 0.096 0.048 1.20 −1.31 0.97 0.82 1.01 [0.02] 0.69 [0.05]
19 0.055 0.027 1.51 −1.54 1.27 0.59 1.40 [0.04] 0.36 [0.03]
20 0.032 0.016 1.81 −1.76 1.57 0.42 1.77 [0.01] 0.00 [0.00]
21 0.345 0.086 0.60 −1.06 0.36 1.10 0.35 [0.02] 1.07 [0.04]
22 0.193 0.048 0.90 −1.31 0.66 0.85 0.69 [0.01] 0.79 [0.04]
23 0.110 0.027 1.20 −1.54 0.97 0.62 1.01 [0.03] 0.64 [0.05]
24 0.064 0.016 1.51 −1.76 1.27 0.40 1.38 [0.05] 0.30 [0.04]
25 0.038 0.010 1.81 −1.96 1.57 0.14 1.57 [0.01] 0.15 [0.00]
26 0.439 0.027 0.60 −1.54 0.36 0.58 0.50 [0.04] 0.62 [0.07]
27 0.256 0.016 0.90 −1.76 0.66 0.36 0.85 [0.04] 0.47 [0.05]
28 0.154 0.010 1.20 −1.96 0.97 0.16 1.31 [0.07] 0.29 [0.07]
29 0.033 0.534 1.51 −0.55 1.27 1.61 1.32 [0.03] 1.50 [0.04]
30 0.018 0.288 1.81 −0.81 1.57 1.35 1.63 [0.02] 0.77 [0.03]
31 0.125 1.000 0.90 −0.16 0.66 1.96 0.64 [0.02] 2.06 [0.04]
32 0.063 1.000 1.20 −0.29 0.97 1.85 0.97 [0.02] 1.93 [0.02]
33 0.031 1.000 1.51 −0.45 1.27 1.67 1.33 [0.01] 1.52 [0.08]
34 0.016 1.000 1.81 −0.63 1.57 1.49 1.55 [0.01] 0.69 [0.09]
35 1.000 0.355 0.05 −0.45 −0.19 1.65 −0.12 [0.01] 1.70 [0.03]
36 1.000 0.178 0.09 −0.75 −0.15 1.35 −0.07 [0.02] 1.43 [0.03]
37 1.000 0.089 0.14 −1.04 −0.10 1.06 −0.02 [0.03] 1.10 [0.03]
38 1.000 0.045 0.20 −1.34 −0.04 0.76 0.07 [0.03] 0.88 [0.03]
39 1.000 0.022 0.27 −1.63 0.03 0.47 0.17 [0.04] 0.58 [0.03]
40 1.000 0.011 0.36 −1.90 0.13 0.20 0.45 [0.09] 0.36 [0.04]

*Filter 0 represents no filtering condition.

The baseline acuity value was directly obtained from the cut-off spatial frequency (51.9 cpd) of the normal CSF function, using Equation 11 in Supplementary Appendix 2.

The baseline Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity value obtained from the peak of the normal CSF function is 2.5 log units, which exceeds the test capacity of the Pelli-Robson chart and therefore was normalized to the baseline value of our subject pool.