Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 14;6(Suppl 4):e004986. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-004986

Table 2.

Data on intervention context, implementation and mechanisms used in meta-regression analysis

Study author Country and main year of implementation National estimates of % PLHIV on ART Total population in intervention area HIVST distributed (total and per 1000 residents of intervention areas) Reported HIVST use in previous 12 months at endline survey (%) Know where to access care if test HIV-positive
Indravudh et al17 Malawi, 2017 72.6 Total population: 93 640 adults; 44 390 in intervention area Total: 220 314 (including intervention and other distribution areas). No population denominator available for HIVST distribution in this study 37.7* 74.7%
Indravudh et al8 Malawi, 2019 78.5 Total population: 84 392 residents; 44 519 in intervention area Total: 24 316
Per 1000 intervention population: 546
74.7† Data not available
Neuman et al18 Zambia, 2017 72.2 Total population: 308 822; 148 541 in intervention area Total: 65 585
Per 1000 intervention population: 442
23.2* 78.7%
Sibanda et al13 Zimbabwe, 2017 67.9 Total population: 195 076 Total: 80 378
Per 1000 intervention population: 412
50.2†* 57.4%
Sibanda et al16 Zimbabwe, 2019 76.5 Total population of HIVST wards: 242 096 Total:
59 631
Per 1000 intervention population: 246
24.5†* 76.7%

*HIVST uptake ascertained after 12–16 months of continuous distribution.

†HIVST uptake ascertained 3 months after the start of campaign-style distribution.

‡HIVST update ascertained during campaign-style distribution.

ART, antiretroviral therapy; HIVST, HIV self-testing; PLHIV, people living with HIV.