Table 1.
Bivariate correlations, means, and standard deviation for study variables.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Discrimination W1 | – | |||||||||||
| 2 Discrimination W2 | .54** | – | ||||||||||
| 3 Brokering efficacy for mothers W1 | −.20** | −.15** | – | |||||||||
| 4 Brokering efficacy for mothers W2 | −.17** | −.24** | .50** | – | ||||||||
| 5 Brokering efficacy for fathers W1 | −.22** | −.21** | .75** | .53** | – | |||||||
| 6 Brokering efficacy for fathers W2 | −.24** | −.22** | .44** | .71** | .53** | – | ||||||
| 7 Learning goals W1 | −.12** | −.21** | .35** | .28** | .33** | .27** | – | |||||
| 8 Learning goals W2 | −.21** | −.22** | .23** | .27** | .25** | .24** | .43** | – | ||||
| 9 School engagement W1 | −.27** | −.23** | .40** | .34** | .36** | .32** | .53** | .40** | – | |||
| 10 School engagement W2 | −.22** | −.27** | .24** | .38** | .28** | .31** | .38** | .55** | .51** | – | ||
| 11 Grades W1 | −.13** | −.13** | .23** | .23** | .21** | .16** | .32** | .24** | .37** | .31** | – | |
| 12 Grades W2 | −.11* | −.14** | .13** | .24** | .17** | .27** | .26** | .22** | .33** | .38** | .51** | – |
| Mean | 1.63 | 1.56 | 3.4 | 3.44 | 3.37 | 3.38 | 3.91 | 3.87 | 3.91 | 3.88 | 10.1 | 10.01 |
| SD | .48 | .47 | .71 | .67 | .76 | .76 | .67 | .68 | .6 | .58 | 1.81 | 1.90 |
| Min observed values | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Max observed values | 3.89 | 3.67 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 13.00 | 13.00 |
| N | 604 | 483 | 602 | 482 | 530 | 419 | 604 | 483 | 604 | 483 | 602 | 482 |
Note. W1 = Wave 1; W2 = Wave 2.
p < .01.